Opinions by Richard B. Sanders, Justice of the Washington Supreme Court
Current through June 7th, 2012
(Published opinions available in most law libraries and LegalWA.org, recent ones also on the Court's Internet website: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/)
Dissenting Opinions
- State v. Hunsicker, 129 Wn.2d 554,
919 P.2d 79 (1996) (dissenting, the court must follow applicable
statute and set restitution within 60 days)
- State v. Rivers, 129 Wn.2d 697,
921 P.2d 495 (1996) (dissenting, “Three Strikes You’re
Out” mandatory life without possible parole unconstitutionally
cruel)
- Brown v. State, 130 Wn.2d 430, 924
P.2d 908 (1996) (dissenting, turn of century railroad deed creates
easement extinguished by abandonment and title should revert to
property owners)
- State v. King, 130 Wn.2d 517, 925
P.2d 606 (1996) (dissenting, defendant’s Fifth Amendment right
against self-incrimination violated when the State punished
defendant for disclosing during court ordered sex therapy commission
of uncharged rapes)
- State v. Wakefield, 130 Wn.2d 464,
925 P.2d 183 (1996) (dissenting, the court should be bound by
promises it makes when inducing a plea bargain between prosecutor
and defendant)
- Osborn v. Grant County, 130 Wn.2d
615, 926 P.2d 911 (1996) (dissenting, the State should pay the
attorneys fees for a special prosecutor appointed by the court to
defend a county employee)
- CLEAN v. State, 130 Wn.2d 782, 928
P.2d 1054 (1996) (dissenting, tax for major league baseball
stadium is not an emergency and therefore not exempt from public
referendum)
- In re the Welfare of Amyann J.R.,
No. 63964-7, unpublished, July 17, 1996 (dissenting, appointed
counsel in indigent appeal must be paid reasonable and adequate fee
as per market standards)
- Leingang v. Pierce County Medical
Bureau, Inc., 131 Wn.2d 133, 930 P.2d 288 (1997) (dissenting, health
care provider violated Consumer Protection Act and tortiously
interfered with insured’s contract with automobile insurer)
- Magula v. Benton Franklin Title
Co., Inc., 131 Wn.2d 171, 930 P.2d 307 (1997) (dissenting, identity
of one’s spouse is not “marital status” for
purpose of anti-discrimination law)
- Honey v. Davis, 131 Wn.2d 212, 930
P.2d 908 (1997) (dissenting, something about suretyship)
- Washington State Legislature v.
Lowry, 131 Wn.2d 309, 931 P.2d 885 (1997) (dissenting, “section”
for purposes of Governor’s section veto is defined by the
legislature, and appropriation item veto must vary dollar amount)
- Hillis v. Dep’t of Ecology,
131 Wn.2d 373, 932 P.2d 139 (1997) (dissenting, Department of
Ecology should be held to law requiring it to timely process water
rights applications, 8 year delay unlawful)
- Citizens for More Important Things
v. King County, 131 Wn.2d 411, 932 P.2d 135 (1997) (dissenting,
County ordinance authorizing bonds for preconstruction costs of the
new baseball stadium conflicts with the Stadium Act and is an
invalid diversion of state revenues to an unlawful purpose)
- Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612, 934
P.2d 669 (1997) (dissenting, members of unincorporated homeowners
associations should be held jointly and severally liable for all
debts of the association)
- City of Kennewick v. Benton
County, 131 Wn.2d 768, 935 P.2d 606 (1997) (dissenting, Tri-Cities
Coliseum is neither wholly nor partially exempt from local property
tax simply because it is partially owned by a municipality)
- Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue,
132 Wn.2d 103, 937 P.2d 154 (1997) (dissenting, Bellevue’s
restrictions on adult entertainment are unconstitutional free speech
infringements)
- In re Clark Garen, B.A. No. 61,
unpublished, May 20, 1997 (dissenting, out-of-state lawyer applicant
must not be discriminatorily denied license based on erroneous and
conclusory findings of bar fitness committee)
- State v. McClendon, 131 Wn.2d 853,
935 P.2d 1334 (1997) (dissenting, probationary driver license
leading to enhanced jail time is punitive, and not solely remedial,
for double jeopardy purposes)
- State v. Valentine, 132 Wn.2d 1,
935 P.2d 1294 (1997) (dissenting, uphold the common law right to
resist unlawful arrest with reasonable force)
- Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of
Seattle, 132 Wn.2d 267, 937 P.2d 1082 (1997) (dissenting, City of
Seattle violated its own ordinances by granting preliminary approval
to vacate various streets without requiring compensation from the
party taking possession of the previously public thoroughfares)
- King County v. Taxpayers of King
County, 133 Wn.2d 584, 949 P.2d 1260 (1997) (dissenting, sweetheart
lease of public baseball stadium to Mariners for substantially
reduced rent is an unconstitutional gift of public funds for private
purposes)
- State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668,
940 P.2d 1239 (1997) (dissenting, defendant unconstitutionally
denied right to represent himself)
- Seeley v. State, 132 Wn.2d 776,
940 P.2d 604 (1997) (dissenting, cancer patient has constitutional
right to medicinal marijuana)
- Matter of Det. of McClatchey, 133
Wn.2d 1, 940 P.2d 646 (1997) (dissenting, sexual predator who does
not receive treatment during confinement is punished and double
jeopardy applies)
- Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner, 133
Wn.2d 192, 943 P.2d 286 (1997) (dissenting, plaintiff improperly
denied trial in suit alleging business negligent in not providing
security against a known danger)
- Medcalf v. State, Dep’t of
Licensing, 133 Wn.2d 290, 944 P.2d 1014 (1997) (dissenting,
defendant should have been able to offer evidence that compulsive
disorder prevented ability to consent to Breathalyzer subject to
evidentiary threshold)
- State v. Hamlet, 133 Wn.2d 314,
944 P.2d 1026 (1997) (dissenting, prejudicial evidence is not
harmless)
- State v. Catlett, 133 Wn.2d 355,
945 P.2d 700 (1997) (dissenting, forfeiture of defendant’s car
for drug violation is punishment for purposes of double jeopardy
under Federal Constitution and, independently, State Constitution)
- State v. Bourgeois, 133 Wn.2d 389,
945 P.2d 1120 (1997) (dissenting, evidence was not harmless)
- Christianson v. Snohomish Health
Dist., 133 Wn.2d 647, 946 P.2d 768 (1997) (dissenting, denial of
remodel permit violates due process when no nexus to septic tank
problem)
- Matter of Well, 133 Wn.2d 433, 946
P.2d 750 (1997) (dissenting, mental patient’s petition for
writ of habeas corpus not barred by one-year limitation which
applies only to those criminally convicted and sentenced)
- Freitag v. McGhie, 133 Wn.2d 816,
947 P.2d 1186 (1997) (dissenting, statute of limitations for
fraudulent conveyance begins to run after the transfer was, or could
have been, discovered)
- Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City
of Mount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 947 P.2d 1208 (1997) (dissenting,
objection must be raised in administrative hearing to be considered
on appeal)
- Washington State Coalition for
Homeless v. Department of Social and Health Services, 133 Wn.2d 894,
949 P.2d 1291 (1997) (dissenting, improper to judicially mandate
massive diversion of tax dollars to fund program which the
Legislature has not authorized)
- Young v. Estate of Snell, 134
Wn.2d 267, 948 P.2d 1291 (1997) (dissenting, statute expressly
disclaims any limitation period for probate claims against insurance
company)
- Gerberding v. Munro, 134 Wn.2d
188, 949 P.2d 1366 (1998) (dissenting, term limits law does not
violate state constitution)
- Reninger v. State Dep’t of
Corrections, 134 Wn.2d 437, 951 P.2d 782 (1998) (dissenting, civil
servant may sue government employer for constructive discharge and
is not barred by administrative collateral estoppel)
- Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market,
Inc., 134 Wn.2d 468, 951 P.2d 749 (1998) (dissenting, a remote
transferee of alcohol unlawfully sold to another minor may not
maintain an action against the original vendor)
- Crowe v. Gaston, 134 Wn.2d 509,
951 P.2d 1118 (1998) (dissenting, a remote transferee of alcohol
unlawfully sold to another minor may not maintain an action against
the original vendor)
- State v. Tamalini, 134 Wn.2d 725,
953 P.2d 450 (1998) (dissenting, manslaughter instruction must be
given as a lesser degree in a felony murder case where evidence so
warrants)
- Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser, 134 Wn.2d
795, 953 P.2d 800 (1998) (dissenting, evidence that an injured
worker receives more in benefits while injured than he received
while working is admissible)
- Granite Falls Library Capital
Facility Area v. Taxpayers of Granite Falls Library Capital Facility
Area, 134 Wn.2d 825, 953 P.2d 1150 (1998) (dissenting, library
facility’s power to issue bonds amounts to unconstitutional
delegation of the taxing power)
- Tiegs v. Watts, 135 Wn.2d 1, 954
P.2d 877 (1998) (dissenting, statutory pollution violation not
subject to civil remedy absent prior determination by Department of
Ecology, as per the statute)
- Rabon v. City of Seattle, 135
Wn.2d 1, 954 P.2d 877 (1998) (dissenting, municipal ordinance under
which two pet dogs were sentenced to death conflicts with state law
and accordingly ordinance is invalid, sentence should be vacated,
and dogs should be returned to owner)
- Nielson v. Spanaway, 135 Wn.2d
255, 956 P.2d 312 (1998) (dissenting, plaintiff is constitutionally
entitled to jury trial on amount of damages in state suit, even
after a damages amount has been found by a judge in a related
federal suit)
- State, Dep’t of Ecology v.
Theodoratus, 135 Wn.2d 582, 957 P.2d 1241 (1998)
(dissenting, “beneficial use” of water by permit is
permitted use, not actual use)
- Weden v. San Juan County,
135 Wn.2d 678, 958 P.2d 273 (1998) (dissenting,
absolute ban of jet skis offends due process)
- Rhod A Zalea & 35th,
Inc. v. Snohomish County, 136 Wn.2d 1, 959 P.2d 1024
(1998) (dissenting, change in government regulations may not defeat
nonconforming use)
- Tran v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
Co., 136 Wn.2d 214, 961 P.2d 358 (1998)
(dissenting, claim of insured not barred by refusal to produce
immaterial documents)
- Shumway v. Payne, 136 Wn.2d 383,
964 P.2d 349 (1998) (dissenting, where state Supreme Court has
discretion to review conviction, it cannot be said that state law
bars prisoner’s petition for review)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Heard, 136 Wn.2d 405, 963 P.2d 818 (1998) (dissenting, rules
of professional conduct do not prohibit attorney sex with client)
- State v. Head, 136 Wn.2d 619, 964
P.2d 1187 (1998) (dissenting, six year delay following criminal
trial before entry of written findings of fact and conclusions of
law was an unnecessary delay in violation of article I, section 10
of the Washington Constitution)
- Vargas v. Lehman, No. 67190-7,
unpublished Oct 12, 1998 (dissenting, according to plain language of
statute, execution of Jeremy Sagastegui must be automatically reset
to 30 days after vacation of stay)
- Spokane County v. State, 136 Wn.2d
663, 966 P.2d 314 (1998) (dissenting, separation of powers doctrine
violated when executive branch agency makes decisions in matters
involving judicial branch employees)
- State v. Walker, 136 Wn.2d 678,
965 P.2d 1079 (1998) (dissenting, Fourth Amendment prohibition on
unlawful searches violated where consent for search given by one
cohabitant but not the other)
- Franks & Son v. State, 136
Wn.2d 737, 966 P.2d 1232) (1998) (dissenting, dormant commerce
clause offended by trucking fee)
- State ex rel. Washington State
Convention and Trade Center v. Evans et al., 136 Wn.2d 811, 966 P.2d
1252 (1998) (dissenting, seizure of private property for private use
is unconstitutional)
- Torrance v. King County, 136 Wn.2d
783, 966 P.2d 891 (1998) (dissenting, Growth Management Act violated
by improper agricultural designation of land)
- Brower v. State, 137 Wn.2d 44, 969
P.2d 42 (1998) (dissenting, football stadium not exempt from
referendum as “public emergency)
- State ex rel. Quick-Ruben v.
Verharen, 136 Wn.2d 888, 969 P.2d 64 (1998) (dissenting, a lawsuit
raising issue of first impression not frivolous)
- State v. Martin, 137 Wn.2d 149,
969 P.2d 450 (1999) (dissenting, juvenile disposition hearing is
ineffective if held after mandatory statutory time limit)
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings
against Turco, 137 Wn.2d 227, 970 P.2d 731 (1999) (dissenting, trial
judge not subject to discipline for off-bench, nonjudicial,
nonofficial conduct)
- PRP of Jonathan L. Gentry, 137
Wn.2d 378, 972 P.2d 1250 (1999) (dissenting, constitutional right
violated when prosecution withheld documents)
- Wilson v. Horsley, 137 Wn.2d 500,
974 P.2d 316 (1999) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, motions
to amend pleadings should be liberally granted)
- State v. Studd, 137 Wn.2d 533, 973
P.2d 1049 (1999) (dissenting, an incorrect pattern instruction is
not invited error)
- W.R. Grace v. Department of
Revenue, 137 Wn.2d 580, 573 P.2d 1011 (1999) (dissenting, no
obligation exists to pay an unconstitutional tax which violates
Dormant Commerce Clause)
- Hollis v. Garwall, 137 Wn.2d 683,
974 P.2d 836 (1999) (restriction in covenant on types of residential
construction does not limit land to residential use)
- State v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 975
P.2d 967 (1999) (concurring in part, dissenting in part,
unconstitutional shackling of defendant in death penalty case not
harmless error)
- Tradewell Group d/b/a Development
Services of America v. City of Seattle, 138 Wn.2d 107, 979 P.2d 387
(1999) (dissenting, helistop permit conditioned on private business
necessity exceeds police power)
- Det. of Ronald Lane Petersen, 138
Wn.2d 70, 980 P.2d 1204 (1999) (dissenting, a person who is civilly
committed as sex predator has right to appeal and right to attorney)
- PRP of Gronquist, 138 Wn.2d 388,
978 P.2d 1083 (1999) (dissenting, denial of prisoner’s right
to call witnesses in serious infraction hearing violates his
constitutional right to due process)
- PRP of Breedlove, 138 Wn.2d 298,
979 P.2d 417 (1999) (dissenting, stipulation to an exceptional
sentence insufficient to justify it under statute)
- Aviation West Corp. v. Department
of Labor & Indus., 138 Wn.2d 413, 980 P.2d 701 (1999) (No.
66574-5) (dissenting, administrative regulation against workplace
smoking invalid)
- State v. Robbins, 138 Wn.2d 486,
980 P.2d 725 (1999) (dissenting, statute which criminalizes post
driving blood alcohol content, per se, is unconstitutional)
- In re Ardis Clayton Trapp III, Bar
Applicant, unpublished (July 14, 1999) (dissenting, application to
practice law improperly denied)
- Landmark Development v. City of
Roy, 138 Wn.2d 561, 980 P.2d 1234 (1999) (dissenting, water
connection fee should be reduced by federal grant and arbitrary
discrimination against property owner should be remedied)
- Benjamin v. Washington State Bar
Ass’n, 138 Wn.2d 506, 980 P.2d 742 (1999) (dissenting,
wrongful discharge of public employee for exercise of first
amendment speech)
- CJC v. Corporation of Catholic
Bishop, 138 Wn.2d 699, 985 P.2d 262 (1999) (concurring in dissents,
no corporate responsibility for sex abuse)
- Currens v. Sleek, 138 Wn.2d 858,
983 P.2d 626 (1999) (dissenting, common enemy rule for water damage)
- PRP of Ecklund, 139 Wn.2d 166, 985
P.2d 342 (Oct. 7, 1999) (dissenting, failure to confess crime
insufficient basis to deny parole)
- State v. Clark Elmore, 139 Wn.2d
250, 985 P.2d 289 (Oct. 7, 1999) (dissenting, error to send tape
player to jury absent notice & express ruling by trial judge)
- Det. of Elmer Campbell, 139 Wn.2d
341, 986 P.2d 771 (Oct. 21, 1999) (No. 63986-8) (dissenting, sex
predator is unconstitutionally confined in punitive conditions)
- Det. of Richard Turay, 139 Wn.2d
379, 986 P.2d 790 (Oct. 21, 1999) (No. 64100-5) (dissenting, same as
Campbell, plus other issues)
- In re PRPs of Yim and Samphao, 139
Wn.2d 581, 989 P.2d 512 (Dec 02, 1999) (Nos. 67183-4) (dissenting, a
firework is not an “explosive” for purposes of
Explosives Act)
- Waremart v. Progressive Campaigns,
139 Wn.2d 623, 989 P.2d 524 (Dec 16, 1999) (No. 67029-3)
(dissenting, right to gather initiative signatures not limited to
shopping malls)
- Trimble v. Washington State
University, 140 Wn.2d 88, 993 P.2d 259 (Feb 24, 2000) (No. 67409-4)
(dissenting, university must follow faculty manual procedure to
justify denial of tenure to faculty member)
- Open Door Baptist Church v. Clark
County, 140 Wn.2d 143, 995 P.2d 33 (Mar 16, 2000) (dissenting,
zoning against churches without conditional use permit violates
state constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom)
- Drinkwitz & Caproni v. Alliant
Techsystems, 140 Wn.2d 291, 996 P.2d 582 (Apr 06, 2000) (dissenting,
inadvertent deductions do not destroy professional exemption to
minimum wage act)
- Allan v. University of Washington,
140 Wn.2d 323, 997 P.2d 360 (Apr 20, 2000) (No. 67294-6)
(dissenting, professor’s wife has standing to challenge
improperly promulgated rules)
- Sundquist Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish
County PUD #1, 140 Wn.2d 403, 997 P.2d 915 (Apr 27, 2000)
(dissenting, public utility district may not shift cost of utility
pole relocation to adjacent property owner)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Lowell K. Halverson, 140 Wn.2d 475, 998 P.2d 833 (Apr 27,
2000) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, attorney involved in
sexual affair with client did not fail to render candid advice or
exercise independent judgment)
- M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Timberline
Software Corp., 140 Wn.2d 568, 998 P.2d 305 (May 4, 2000)
(dissenting, software licensing agreement is proposal to modify
prior contract)
- State ex rel. Evergreen Freedom
Found. v. Washington Education Ass’n, 140 Wn.2d 615, 999 P.2d
602 (May 18, 2000) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, use of
withheld wages for political purposes unlawful)
- In re Det. of Donald Henrickson,
140 Wn.2d 686, 2 P.3d 473 (May 18, 2000) (dissenting, recent overt
act required to commit sex predator)
- State v. Berry, 141 Wn.2d 121, 5
P.3d 658 (July 6, 2000) (dissenting, California stayed conviction
should not count as “strike” under Washington law)
- In re PRP of Mark Alan Crabtree,
141 Wn.2d 577, 9 P.3d 814 (Sept 14, 2000) (dissenting, guilty plea
to charges alleging criminal conduct prior to effective date
of statute should be vacated)
- State v. Bradley, 141 Wn.2d 731,
10 P.3d 358 (Sept 28, 2000) (dissenting, self-defense against prison
guard justified by reasonable perception of great bodily injury or
death)
- State v. Cecil Emil Davis, 141
Wn.2d 798, 10 P.3d 977 (Sept 28, 2000) (dissenting, aggravating
factors to first degree murder must be found by unanimous jury)
- Postema v. Pollution Control
Hearings Bd., 142 Wn.2d 68, 11 P.3d 726 (Oct 19, 2000) (dissenting,
de minimis, nonquantifiable, effect on surface water no reason to
deny well permit)
- State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17,
11 P.3d 714 (Oct 19, 2000) (dissenting, apartment guest has
automatic standing to contest unconstitutional search)
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local
587 v. State, 142 Wn.2d 183, 11 P.3d 762 (Oct 26, 2000) (dissenting,
Initiative Measure 695 constitutional single subject, proper
exercise of inherent authority to condition enactments on vote of
people, and not invalid for alleged failure to set forth amended
statutes verbatim)
- Haley v. Highland, 142 Wn.2d 135,
12 P.3d 119 (Nov 2, 2000) (dissenting, party who increases award of
attorney fees on mandatory arbitration appeal improves his position)
- In re PRP of Brent Allen Davis,
142 Wn.2d 165, 12 P.3d 603 (Nov 2, 2000) (dissenting, multiple
prosecution for drug manufacture violates Double Jeopardy)
- In re PRP of Darold J. Stenson,
142 Wn.2d 710, 16 P.3d 1 (Jan 04, 2001) (dissenting, attorney who
abandons fight against conviction contrary to client's wishes is
ineffective in his representation)
- State v. Negash Atsbeha, 142 Wn.2d
904, 16 P.3d 626 (Feb 01, 2001) (dissenting, brain damage relevant
to diminished capacity defense)
- Hallauer v. Spectrum Properties,
143 Wn.2d 126, 18 P.3d 540 (Feb 22, 2001) (dissenting, private
condemnation should not be available absent showing specific source
of water is necessary to benefit land)
- State v. Daniel Platt, 143 Wn.2d
242, 19 P.3d 412 (Mar 15, 2001) (dissenting, private condemnation
should not be available absent showing specific source of water is
necessary to benefit land)
- In re Pers. Restraint of Richard
Dyer, 143 Wn.2d 384, 20 P.3d 907 (Mar 29, 2001) (No. 67673-9)
(dissenting, arbitrary denial of extended family visitation to
prisoner violated his constitutional rights)
- In re Pers. Restraint of Paul J.
Becker, 143 Wn.2d 491, 20 P.3d 409 (Apr 5, 2001) (No. 68700-5)
(dissenting, personal restraint petition should not be barred as
successive based on prior motion to vacate
- In re Pers. Restraint of Cal
Brown, 143 Wn.2d 431, 21 P.3d 687 (Apr 19, 2001) (No. 66686-5)
(dissenting, failure of appellate counsel to argue against
admissibility of past crime conviction is denial of effective
assistance of counsel)
- State v. Dwayne Anthony Woods, 143
Wn.2d 561, 23 P.3d 1046 (May 24, 2001) (dissenting, death penalty
not permitted when notice of intent to seek penalty not served
within 30 days of rearraignment)
- Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tripp,
144 Wn.2d 1, 25 P.3d 997 (June 28, 2001) (concurring in part,
dissenting in part, UIM insurance company not prejudiced by
settlement between insured and tortfeasor when it did not offer
liability limits buy out)
- State v. Elledge, 144 Wn.2d 62, 26
P.3d 271 (July 5, 2001) (dissenting, mandatory proportionality
review in death case requires rejection of “wanton and
freakish” standard which is inconsistent with text)
- State v. Stein, 144 Wn.2d 236, 27
P.3d 184 (July 12, 2001) (dissenting, remedy for unnecessary delay
should be dismissal)
- PRP of Connick, 144 Wn.2d 44, 28
P.3d 729 (Aug 2, 2001) (dissenting, prisoner has carried burden to
demonstrate offender score was improperly calculated)
- To-Ro Trade Shows v. Collins, 144
Wn.2d 403, 27 P.3d 1149 (Aug 2, 2001) (dissenting, To-Ro improperly
denied standing to contest constitutionality of state statute
regulating trade shows)
- State v. Horrace, 144 Wn.2d 386,
28 P.3d 753 (Aug 2, 2001) (dissenting, search warrant should have
been obtained for search of automobile passenger)
- State v. Vrieling, 144 Wn.2d 489,
28 P.3d 762 (Aug 9, 2001) (dissenting, warrant requirement for
search should be fully applicable to motor homes)
- State v. Heinsma, 144 Wn.2d 556,
29 P.3d 709 (Aug 23, 2001) (dissenting, Vancouver domestic partner
benefit plan violates state statute which requires nonemployee be
“dependent”)
- Recall of Lakewood City Council,
144 Wn.2d 583, 30 P.3d 474 (Sept 6, 2001) (dissenting, recall
election proper where Open Public Meetings Act is violated)
- Babcock v. Mason County Fire
District, 144 Wn.2d 774, 30 P.3d 1261 (Sept 13, 2001)
(dissenting, public duty doctrine should be discarded)
- State v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 30
P.3d 1278 (Sept 13, 2001) (dissenting, recorded expression of police
officer’s opinion that defendant was lying is not admissible
into evidence)
- Kim v. Lee, 145 Wn.2d 79, 31 P.3d
665 (Sept 20, 2001) (dissenting, doctrine of equitable subrogation
applicable to replacement mortgage)
- State v. Breazeale, 144 Wn.2d 829,
31 P.3d 1155 (Sept 27, 2001) (dissenting, state patrol should have
been held in contempt)
- Budget Rent A Car Corp. v. Dep’t
of Licensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 31 P.3d 1174 (Oct 4, 2001) (concurring
in part, dissenting in part, “total fleet” to calculate
tax on car rental companies should be average, not highest, number
of cars)
- State v. Wheeler, 145 Wn.2d 116,
34 P.3d 799 (Nov. 21, 2001) (dissenting, to constitutionally apply
3-strikes statute, existence of prior strikes must be proved to
jury)
- State v. Fire, 145 Wn.2d 152, 34
P.3d 1218 (Nov 29, 2001) (dissenting, erroneous denial of challenge
to juror for cause forcing party to exhaust preemptory challenges is
reversible error)
- Pickett v. Holland America Line,
145 Wn.2d 178, 35 P.3d 351 (Nov 29, 2001) (dissenting, class action
settlement unreasonable where based in part on denial of class
certification for litigation purposes)
- In re Pers. Restraint of
Stoudmire, 145 Wn.2d 258, 36 P.3d 1005 (Dec 13, 2001) (dissenting,
for valid plea of guilty defendant must be apprised of potential
sentence)
- In re Det. of Brooks, 145 Wn.2d
275, 36 P.3d 1034 (Dec. 27, 2001) (concurring in part, dissenting in
part, proof beyond reasonable doubt in sex predator statute requires
proof that prisoner will reoffend, not that he will likely reoffend)
- Sedlacek v. Hillis, 145 Wn.2d 379,
36 P.3d 1014 (Dec. 20, 2001) (dissenting, violation of federal
antidiscrimination policy should be actionable in state wrongful
discharge action)
- State v. McNeal, 145 Wn.2d 352, 37
P.3d 280 (Jan. 3, 2002) (dissenting, when special verdict
inconsistent with general verdict, special verdict controls)
- Rios v. Dep’t of Labor &
Indus., 145 Wn.2d 483, 39 P.3d 961 (Feb. 7, 2002) (dissenting, we
must adhere to precedent that excuses government from complying with
law, or overrule Hillis)
- ATU Legislative Council v. State,
145 Wn.2d 544, 40 P.3d 656 (Feb. 14, 2002) (concurring in part,
dissenting in part, personal property tax not repealed by
legislature)
- State v. Norman, 145 Wn.2d 578, 40
P.3d 1161 (Feb 21, 2002) (dissenting, Washington’s northern
boundary is the 49th parallel, and that means “49th parallel”)
- Grant County Fire Prot. Dist. v.
City of Moses Lake, 145 Wn.2d 702, 42 P.3d 394 (Mar 14, 2002)
(dissenting, state privileges and immunities clause differs from
equal protection, deserves independent interpretation but does not
prohibit land petition method of annexation)
- Asarco Inc. v. Dep’t of
Ecology, 145 Wn.2d 750, 43 P.3d 471 (Mar 21, 2002) (dissenting,
Model Toxic Control Act unconstitutionally applied to impose
retroactive joint and several liability)
- DOE v. Campbell & Gwinn, 146
Wn.2d 1, 43 P.3d 4 (Mar 28, 2002) (concurring in dissent, wells
exempt from DOE permits are not limited to one per customer)
- City of Spokane v. Marquette, 146
Wn.2d 124, 43 P.3d 502 (Apr 11, 2002) (dissenting, courts of limited
jurisdiction may not enlarge temporal jurisdiction to punish for
probation violation beyond statutory time limit)
- State v. Rodriguez, 146 Wn.2d 260,
45 P.3d 541 (May 2, 2002) (dissenting, remedy for denial of fair
trial is new trial)
- King v. Snohomish County, 146
Wn.2d 420, 47 P.3d 563 (June 06, 2002) (dissenting, claim filing
defense not waived by ambiguous interrogatory answer)
- Litowitz v. Litowitz, 146 Wn.2d
514, 48 P.3d 261 (June 13, 2002) (dissenting, fate of pre-embryo by
contract left to trial court)
- State v. Schultz, 146 Wn.2d 540,
48 P.3d 301 (June 20, 2002) (dissenting, pretrial no contact order
expires at final judgment)
- State v. Coria, 146 Wn.2d 631, 48
P.3d 980 (June 27, 2002) (dissenting, it is no crime to destroy
one’s own property)
- Wingert v. Yellow Freight System,
Inc. 146 Wn.2d 841, 50 P.3d 256 (July 18, 2002) (dissenting, union
bargaining representative of members has authority to negotiate
breaks with employer)
- Isla Verde Int’l Holdings v.
City of Camas, 146 Wn.2d 740, 49 P.3d 867 (July 11, 2002)
(concurring in part, dissenting in part, plat condition requiring
access over adjoining private property violates due process)
- PUD No. 1 of Pend Oreille v. Dep’t
of Ecology, 146 Wn.2d 778, 51 P.3d 744 (July 18, 2002) (dissenting,
minimum instream flow condition on hydroelectric plant unlawful)
- State v. Jeremy Read, 147 Wn.2d
238, 53 P.3d 26 (Sep 5, 2002) (dissenting, opinion evidence
inadmissible in murder trial)
- WR Enterprises Inc. v. Labor &
Industries, 147 Wn.2d 213, 53 P.3d 504 (Sep 5, 2002) (dissenting,
L&I premiums should be based upon risk experience of industry
class)
- In re Det. of C.W., 147 Wn.2d 259,
53 P.3d 979 (Sep 12, 2002) (dissenting, imprisonment in hospital
emergency room contrary to statute)
- State v. Brown, 147 Wn.2d 330, 58
P.3d 889 (Sep 19, 2002) (dissenting, instruction which fails to
require state to prove every element of crime is not harmless, and
is reversible per se)
- State v. Borrero, 147 Wn.2d 353,
58 P.3d 245 (Sep 19, 2002) (dissenting, criminal information
insufficient because it failed to allege “substantial step”
for attempt crime and jury instructions deficient)
- PRP of Hemenway, 147 Wn.2d 529, 55
P.3d 615 (Oct 10, 2002) (dissenting, breach of plea agreement by
prosecution entitles defendant to specific performance)
- State v. Schelin, 147 Wn.2d 562,
55 P.3d 632 (Oct 17, 2002) (dissenting, simple possession of firearm
cannot be criminalized under state constitution absent its criminal
use)
- Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Baik,
147 Wn.2d 536, 55 P.3d 619 (Oct 17, 2002) (dissenting, law firm made
no misrepresentation to title company)
- State v. Townsend, 147 Wn.2d 666,
57 P.3d 255 (Nov 7, 2002) (dissenting, recording of instant
interactive internet communications violates privacy act)
- Thurston County v. Western
Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, 148 Wn.2d 1, 57 P.3d
1156 (Nov 21, 2002) (dissenting, Growth Management Act allows
extension of urban governmental services to rural areas where
necessary)
- City of Seattle v. Allison, 148
Wn.2d 75, 59 P.3d 85 (Dec 12, 2002) (dissenting, DUI breath results
should be suppressed because proper procedure not followed)
- McGowan v. State, 148 Wn.2d 278,
60 P.3d 67 (Dec. 19, 2002) (dissenting, I-734 requires state to
fully fund school district employee salaries but barred by Harris v.
State)
- City of Tacoma v. William Rogers
Co., Inc., 148 Wn.2d 169, 60 P.3d 79 (Dec. 19, 2002) (dissenting
pass through income of temporary employment firm not part of its
gross taxable income)
- Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Grand
Aerie of Fraternal Order of Eagles, 148 Wn.2d 224, 59 P.3d 655 (Dec.
19, 2002) (dissenting, Eagles is exempt from Washington’s Law
Against Discrimination)
- State v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 60
P.3d 1192 (Jan 9, 2003) (dissenting, trial court is barred from
imposing exceptional sentence on remand)
- State v. C.J., 148 Wn.2d 672, 63
P.3d 765 (Feb 6, 2003) (dissenting, incompetent witness cannot be a
“reliable” declarant for purposes of child hearsay)
- State v. Acrey, 148 Wn.2d 738, 64
P.3d 594 (Feb 27, 2003) (dissenting, seizure of minor by police to
return him home was outside community caretaking exception to
warrant requirement)
- Eggleston v. Pierce County, 148
Wn.2d 760, 64 P.3d 618 (Mar 6, 2003) (dissenting, removal of wall
for evidence is compensable taking or damaging under the state
constitution)
- State v. Ward, State v. Baker, 148
Wn.2d 803, 64 P.3d 640 (Mar 6, 2003) (dissenting, state must prove
felony violation of no contact order is not 1st or 2nd degree
assault)
- State v. Wilson, 149 Wn.2d 1, 65
P.3d 657 (Mar 13, 2003) (dissenting, criminal charges may be
dismissed for governmental misconduct)
- In re Parentage of Jannot, 149
Wn.2d 123, 65 P.3d 664 (Mar 27, 2003) (dissenting, no deference to
trial court appropriate on motion to modify parenting plan)
- State v. Banks, 149 Wn.2d 38, 65
P.3d 1198 (Apr 3, 2003) (dissenting, omission of finding that every
element of offense proved beyond reasonable doubt usually requires
reversal)
- In re PRP of Tortorelli, 149 Wn.2d
82, 66 P.3d 606 (Apr 10, 2003) (dissenting, submerged trees not
owned by state)
- Wash. Ass’n of Neighborhood
Stores v. State, 149 Wn.2d 359, 70 P.3d 920 (May 8, 2003)
(dissenting, tobacco tax initiative violates constitutional
prohibition on future appropriations)
- State v. DeSantiago, 149 Wn.2d
402, 68 P.3d 1065 (May 15, 2003) (dissenting, admission of prior
testimony absent right to cross-examine was error)
- State v. Pauling, 149 Wn.2d 381,
69 P.3d 331(May 22, 2003) (dissenting, we should not rewrite
extortion statute to save it)
- State v. Khounvichai, 149 Wn.2d
557, 69 P.3d 862 (Jun 5, 2003) (dissenting, homeowner must be
advised of right to refuse entry by police before invasion of home
by consent is valid)
- MW and AW v. DSHS, 149 Wn.2d 589,
70 P.3d 954 (Jun 12, 2003) (dissenting, DSHS owes duty not to harm
child during investigation)
- Citizens for Responsible Wildlife
Management v. State, 149 Wn.2d 622, 71 P.3d 644 (Jun 19, 2003)
(dissenting, as per Amalgamated, initiative violates double subject
rule)
- Parents Involved in Community
Schools v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1, 149 Wn.2d 660, 72 P.3d 151
(Jun 26, 2003) (dissenting, school district racial tie breaker
violates state law)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Kagele, 149 Wn.2d 793, 72 P.3d 1067 (Jul 17, 2003)
(dissenting, nonrefundable retainer not necessarily excessive fee)
- State v. Snedden, 149 Wn.2d 914,
73 P.3d 995 (Aug 7, 2003) (dissenting, indecent exposure is not a
“crime against a person”)
- In re PRP of Percer, 150 Wn.2d 41,
75 P.3d 488 (Aug 21, 2003) (dissenting, multiple punishments for
single homicide violates double jeopardy)
- In re PRP of Turay, 150 Wn.2d 71,
74 P.3d 1194 (Aug 21, 2003) (dissenting, one year time bar on
personal restraint petitions applies only to criminal convictions,
not civil commitments, and, here, a recent overt act must be proved)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Michels, 150 Wn.2d 159, 75 P.3d 950 (Sep 4, 2003)
(dissenting, judicial conduct commission unreasonably delayed
proceeding against a judge)
- State v. Swenson, 150 Wn.2d 181,
75 P.3d 513 (Sep 4, 2003) (dissenting, speedy trial rule expired)
- City of Seattle v. Guay, 150 Wn.2d
288, 76 P.3d 231 (Sep 11, 2003) (dissenting, dismissal under speedy
trial rule appropriate for lack of diligence)
- State v. Moen, 150 Wn.2d 221, 76
P.3d 721 (Sep 11, 2003) (dissenting, dismissal of criminal charge
appropriate where presenter refuses to negotiate for plea based on
discovery in collateral proceeding)
- State v. Berube, 150 Wn.2d 498, 79
P.3d 1144 (Nov 13, 2003) (dissenting, misinstruction to jury on
elements of crime is not harmless error)
- PRP of Carlstad, 150 Wn.2d 583, 80
P.3d 587 (Dec 4, 2003) (dissenting, Washington should adopt “mail
box rule” for prisoners filing PRP)
- Washington Education Ass’n
v. Washington Public Disclosure Comm’n, 150 Wn.2d 612, 80 P.3d
608 (Dec 11, 2003) (dissenting, WEA improperly denied its day in
court to challenge free speech restraints)
- State v. Cheatam, 150 Wn.2d 626,
81 P.3d 830 (Dec 11, 2003) (dissenting, warrantless seizure from
jail locker violates constitution)
- PRP of Grasso, 151 Wn.2d 1, 84
P.3d 859 (Feb 5, 2004) (dissenting, hearsay inadmissible when
declarant instructed she need not answer questions)
- Sane Transit v. Sound Transit, 151
Wn.2d 50, 85 P.3d 346 (Mar 4, 2004) (dissenting, reduction in length
of light rail not approved by voters)
- State v. Carter, 151 Wn.2d 118, 85
P.3d 887 (Mar 11, 2004) (dissenting, inspection of inner working of
firearm requires a warrant)
- Blaney v. Int’l Ass’n
of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 151 Wn.2d 203, 87 P.3d 757
(Apr 1, 2004) (dissenting, error in jury instruction on calculation
of future earnings not harmless)
- State ex rel. Citizens Against
Tolls v. Murphy, 151 Wn.2d 226, 88 P.3d 375 (Apr 8, 2004)
(dissenting, improper to severely shorten time to respond to summary
judgment motion)
- State v. Downing, 151 Wn.2d 265,
87 P.3d 1169 (Apr 15, 2004) (dissenting, error not to continue trial
to allow defense opportunity to call witness)
- Guardianship Estate of Danny
Keffeler, 151 Wn.2d 331, 88 P.3d 949 (Apr 29, 2004) (dissenting,
equal protection violation exists when status of representative
payee determines ability to retain benefits)
- Western Farm Service v. Olsen, 151
Wn.2d 645, 90 P.3d 1053, (May 27, 2004) (dissenting, collateral
subject to bank’s security interest was sale price of
potatoes, not cost of transportation)
- State v. Goins, 151 Wn.2d 728, 92
P.3d 181 (Jun 10, 2004) (dissenting, inconsistent verdicts require
reversal)
- Otani v. Broudy, 151 Wn.2d 750, 92
P.3d 192 (Jun 10, 2004) (dissenting, loss of enjoyment of life due
to shortened life span compensable in survival action)
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards
Corp., 151 Wn.2d 853, 93 P.3d 108 (Jun 24, 2004) (dissenting, lump
sum payment in consideration of union bargaining agreement not
subject to Minimum Wage Act)
- Marriage of Horner, 151 Wn.2d 884,
93 P.3d 124 (Jun 24, 2004) (dissenting, this appeal is moot and
should be dismissed)
- State v. Thompson (James R.), 151
Wn.2d 793, 92 P.3d 228 (Jun 24, 2004) (dissenting, warrantless
search based on claimed consent unconstitutional without consent of
co-occupant who is present)
- Seattle Police Officers Guild v.
City of Seattle, 151 Wn.2d 823, 92 P.3d 243 (Jun 24, 2004)
(dissenting, statute requiring promotions based on merit violated by
“rule of five”)
- PRP of David Higgins, 152 Wn.2d
155, 95 P.3d 330 (Jul 22, 2004) (dissenting, DOC may not
unilaterally rehear serious infraction while PRP is pending)
- Judd v. ATT, 152 Wn.2d 195, 95
P.3d 337 (Jul 29, 2004) (dissenting, Consumer Protection Act creates
independent cause of action against telephone company)
- Barrett v. Lucky 7 Saloon, 152
Wn.2d 259, 96 P.3d 386 (Aug 26, 2004) (dissenting, merchant
liability for overservice should not be extended to “apparent”
intoxication)
- Christensen v. Grant County
Hospital Dist No. 1, 152 Wn.2d 299, 96 P.3d 957 (Aug 26, 2004)
(dissenting, administrative collateral estoppel should not bar claim
of worker)
- State v. Teal, 152 Wn.2d 333, 96
P.3d 974 (Sep 2, 2004) (dissenting, state must prove elements in “to
convict” instruction even if in error)
- City of Seattle v. Mighty Movers,
152 Wn.2d 343, 96 P.3d 979 (Sep 9, 2004) (dissenting, state
constitution recognizes free speech right to post signs on utility
poles)
- Yousoufian v. Office of Ron Sims,
152 Wn.2d 421, 98 P.3d 463 (Sep 30, 2004) (dissenting in part,
Public Disclosure Act requires penalty for each record withheld)
- State v. Eckblad, 152 Wn.2d 515,
98 P.3d 1184 (Oct 14, 2004) (dissenting, seat belt statute
unconstitutionally vague)
- State v. Bradshaw and State v.
Latovlovici, 152 Wn.2d 528, 98 P.3d 1190 (Oct 14, 2004) (dissenting,
proof of unlawful possession of controlled substance should include
knowledge)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against DeRuiz, 152 Wn.2d 558, 99 P.3d 881 (Oct 21, 2004)
(dissenting, two six-month attorney suspensions should run
concurrently)
- PRP of Cecil Davis, 152 Wn.2d 647,
101 P.3d 1 (Nov 4, 2004) (concurring in part, dissenting in part,
unconstitutional shackling mandates new trial)
- Branson v. Port of Seattle, 152
Wn.2d 862, 101 P.3d 67 (Nov 18, 2004) (dissenting, airport’s
gross receipts fee on car rental companies unlawful)
- PRP of Turay, 153 Wn.2d 44, 101
P.3d 854 (Nov 18, 2004) (dissenting, successive PRP not an abuse of
writ when based on new precedent)
- PRP of Darold Stenson, 153 Wn.2d
137, 102 P.3d 151 (Nov 24, 2004) (dissenting, proportionality review
in capital case improper with corrupted data base)
- Estate of Margaret Black, 153
Wn.2d 152, 102 P.3d 796 (Dec 9, 2004) (dissenting, will should have
been admitted to probate)
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto &
Truck Painting, 153 Wn.2d 238, 103 P.3d 792 (Dec. 23, 2004)
(concurring in part, dissenting in part, all voluntary dismissals
governed by CR 41)
- State v. Carneh, 153 Wn.2d 274,
103 P.3d 743 (Dec 23, 2004) (concurring in part, dissenting in part,
comment on defendant’s exercise of right not to answer
questions improper)
- State v. Willis, 153 Wn.2d 366,
103 P.3d 1213 (Jan 6, 2005) (dissenting, sentence enhancement for
armed crime requires nexus between gun and crime)
- State v. Barnes, 153 Wn.2d 378,
103 P.3d 1219 (Jan 13, 2005) (dissenting, firearm enhancement not
proper when defendant did not have knowledge firearm was present)
- Wash. State Grange v. Locke, 153
Wn.2d 475, 105 P.3d 9 (Jan 20, 2005) (dissenting, bill creating a
“qualifying primary” violates subject in title rule when
germane section vetoed)
- Thompson v. King Feed &
Nutrition Service, 153 Wn.2d 553, 105 P.3d 378 (Jan 20, 2005)
(partially dissenting, jury improperly instructed on destroyed
property measure of damages and sanctions for failure to admit
conclusions of law improper)
- State v. Roggenkamp, 153 Wn.2d
614, 106 P.3d 196 (Feb 10, 2005) (dissenting, definition of reckless
driving)
- State v. Robinson, 153 Wn.2d 689,
107 P.3d 90 (Feb 24, 2005) (dissenting, by court rule indigent
defendants attempting to vacate guilty plea are entitled to an
appointed lawyer)
- In re Marriage of Muhammad, 153
Wn.2d 795, 108 P.3d 779 (Mar 24, 2005) (dissenting, job status of
husband may be considered as property distribution factor)
- Vallandigham v. Clover Park Dist.
# 400, 154 Wn.2d 16, 109 P.3d 805 (Apr 7, 2005) (dissenting,
employer liable where places employee in situation where harm is
highly probable)
- State v. Carter, 154 Wn.2d
71, 109 P.3d 823 (Apr 14, 2005) (dissenting, instructional error
requires reversal)
- State v. Law, 154 Wn.2d 85, 110
P.3d 717 (Apr 21, 2005) (dissenting, downward exceptional sentence
need not be premised on factors regarding the crime itself)
- PRP of Markels, 154 Wn.2d 262, 111
P.3d 249 (May 5, 2005) (dissenting, Crawford rules apply
retroactively)
- State v. Davis, 154 Wn.2d 291, 111
P.3d 844 (May 12, 2005) (dissenting) 911 call inadmissible hearsay
and violated right to confrontation)
- Ang v. Martin, 154 Wn.2d 477, 114
P.3d 637 (June 23, 2005) (dissenting, same standard should apply to
criminal malpractice as for civil)
- State v. Woods, 154 Wn.2d 613, 114
P.3d 1174 (June 30, 2005) (for plurality, competency of small child
not established)
- State v. Hiett, 154 Wn.2d 560, 115
P.3d 274 (June 30, 2005) (dissenting, restitution requires
defendant’s crime caused the damage, but here it did not)
- James v. County of Kitsap, 154
Wn.2d 574, 115 P.3d 286 (July 7, 2005) (dissenting, LUPA 21 day rule
does not bar action for monetary compensation)
- Washington State Farm Bureau Fed’n
v. Sam Reed, 154 Wn.2d 668, 115 P.3d 301 (July 14, 2005)
(dissenting, referendum required on measure changing supermajority
voting requirement on legislature)
- City of Walla Walla v. Greene, 154
Wn.2d 722, 116 P.3d 1008 (July 28, 2005) (dissenting, due process
violation to enhance penalty for prior DUI charge which was reduced)
- Bosteder v. City of Renton, 155
Wn.2d 18, 117 P.3d 316 (July 28, 2005) (dissenting, no qualified
immunity to suit under 42 USC sec. 1983 where act under void
warrant, nonclaim statute doesn’t pertain to individuals)
- City of Redmond v. Bagby, 155
Wn.2d 59, 117 P.3d 1126 (Aug 11, 2005) (dissenting, notice and
hearing required before suspension of license)
- City of Bremerton v. Hawkins, 155
Wn.2d 107, 117 P.3d 1132 (Aug 11, 2005) (dissenting, notice and
hearing required before suspension of license)
- Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City
of Kent, 155 Wn.2d 225, 119 P.3d 325 (Sep 8, 2005) (dissenting,
final assessment for local improvement district (LID) may violate
taking and due process clause)
- Habitat Watch v. Skagit County,
155 Wn.2d 397; 120 P.3d 56 (Sep 22, 2005) (concurring in part,
dissenting in part, land use decision “issued” when
filed, attorney fee statute violates equal protection)
- State v. Watson, 155 Wn.2d 574,
122 P.3d 903 (Oct 13, 2005) (dissenting, only “aggrieved
party” entitled to review, improper ex parte contact requires
pending action)
- In re Recall of James West, 155
Wn.2d 659, 121 P.3d 1190 (Oct 26, 2005) (dissenting, recall petition
legally and factually insufficient)
- Roberson v. Perez, 156 Wn.2d 33,
123 P.3d 844 (Dec 1, 2005) (dissenting, jury instructions not
subject to exception because law of case; and county subjected
parents to harmful placement decision)
- Christensen v.Royal Sch. Dist.,
156 Wn.2d 62 (Dec 8, 2005) (dissenting, in civil action for sex with
minor consent or comparative fault should be available defenses)
- State v. Klein, 156 Wn.2d 102, 124
P.3d 644 (Dec 15, 2005) (dissenting, drug addiction is not a “mental
disease”)
- City of Olympia v. Drebick, 156
Wn.2d 289, 126 P.3d 802 (Jan 19, 2006) (dissenting, statutorily
permitted “impact fees” cannot be excise taxes)
- State v. Shafer, 156 Wn.2d 381,
128 P.3d 87 (Feb 9, 2006) (dissenting, testimonial statements of
child may violate confrontation clause)
- Sheikh v. Choe, 156 Wn.2d 441, 128
P.3d 574 (Feb 16, 2006) (dissenting, DSHS liable for negligent
placement of foster children)
- State v. Cooper, 156 Wn.2d 475,
128 P.3d 1234 (Feb 23, 2006) (dissenting, crime of endangerment by
controlled substance references child dependent on defendant)
- In re Election Contest Filed by
Coday et al., 156 Wn.2d 485, 130 P.3d 809 (Mar 9, 2006) (dissenting,
res judicata should not bar election contest where plaintiff not
party to prior proceeding)
- Davenport v. WEA, 156 Wn.2d 543,
130 P.3d 352 (Mar 16, 2006) (dissenting, statute which requires
consent of nonunion employee for political expenditure
constitutional)
- State v. Bisson, 156 Wn.2d 507,
130 P.3d 820 (Mar 16, 2006) (dissenting, plea bargain should be
vacated when defendant not accurately informed of sentence)
- In re Det. of Halgren, 156 Wn.2d
795, 132 P.3d 714 (Apr 13, 2006) (dissenting CR 35 exam improper in
involuntary civil commitment proceeding)
- State v. Hosier, 157 Wn.2d 1, 133
P.3d 936 (May 11, 2006) (dissenting, communication with a minor for
immoral purposes requires the minor receive the communication)
- State v. Clarke, 156 Wn.2d 880,
134 P.3d 188 (May 11, 2006) (dissenting, Blakely requires facts
justifying an exceptional term be submitted to the jury)
- State v. McKenzie, 157 Wn.2d 44,
134 P.3d 221 (May 18, 2006) (dissenting, prosecutorial misconduct
which likely affected the verdict calls for reversal)
- State v. Borboa, 157 Wn.2d 108,
135 P.3d 469 (June 1, 2006) (dissenting, for the same reasons as
expressed in State v. Clarke, 156 Wn.2d 880 (May 11, 2006))
- Cobra Roofing Servs. v. Labor &
Inds., 157 Wn.2d 90, 135 P.3d 913 (June 1, 2006) (dissenting, the
Equal Access to Justice Act is not limited to proceedings under the
APA)
- City of Sequim v. Malkasian, 157
Wn.2d 251, 138 P.3d 943 (July 13, 2006) (dissenting, declaratory
injunction action against private citizen to keep initiative off
ballot is nonjusticiable, and citizen should be awarded reasonable
attorney fees)
- Disciplinary Proceeding against
Haley, 157 Wn.2d 398, 138 P.3d 1044 (July 27, 2006) (dissenting, fee
agreement is not a “business transaction” for purpose of
RPC 1.8(a))
- TS, MS & KS v. BSA, 157 Wn.2d
416, 138 P.3d 1053 (July 27, 2006) (dissenting, state constitutional
right to privacy creates a qualified privilege in context of civil
discovery)
- State v. Cromwell, 157 Wn.2d 529,
140 P.3d 593 (Aug 10, 2006) (dissenting, statute prohibits
manufacture of methamphetamine, not its salts)
- Amunrud v. Board of Appeals, 158
Wn.2d 208, 143 P.3d 571 (Sept 21, 2006) (dissenting, revocation of
license on grounds unrelated to the reasons to license the activity
violates due process)
- Disciplinary Proceeding against
Greenlee, 158 Wn.2d 259, 143 P.3d 807 (Oct 5, 2006) (dissenting,
attorney settlement of potential claim does not violate former RPC
1.8(h))
- City of Fircrest v. Jensen, 158
Wn.2d 384, 143 P.3d 776 (Oct 5, 2006) (dissenting, Act relating to
admissibility of DUI tests unconstitutional)
- Pacific NW Shooting Park Ass’n
v. City of Sequim, 158 Wn.2d 342, 144 P.3d 276 (Oct 12, 2006)
(dissenting, statute which prohibits cities from regulating gun
shows means cities can’t regulate gun shows and here it was a
tort to do so)
- State v. Melhaff, 158 Wn.2d 363,
143 P.3d 824 (Oct 12, 2006) (dissenting, judge may not impose
exceptional minimum sentence for a factor not found by jury)
- Mazon v. Krafchick, 158 Wn.2d 440,
144 P.3d 1168 (Oct 19, 2006) (dissenting, where no conflict of
interest, lawyer should be able to recover prospective fees from
negligent co-counsel)
- SuperValu Holdings, Inc. v. Dep’t
of Labor & Indus., 158 Wn.2d 422, 144 P.3d 1160 (Oct 19, 2006)
(dissenting, ergonomics regulations repealed by initiative may not
be administratively reenacted under general duty clause)
- Gourley v. Gourley, 158 Wn.2d 460,
145 P.3d 1185 (Oct 26, 2006) (dissenting, subject of domestic
violence protection order entitled to cross examine witnesses
against him)
- State v. Gregory, 158 Wn.2d 759,
147 P.3d 1201 (Nov 30, 2006) (dissenting, jury instruction on
consent and application of rape shield law was error)
- In re Det. of Audett, 158 Wn.2d
712, 147 P.3d 982 (Nov 30, 2006) (dissenting, remedy for improper CR
35 exam is reversal)
- Pierce County v. State, 159 Wn.2d
16, 148 P.3d 1002 (Dec 7, 2006) (dissenting, repeal of a tax pledged
for bond repayment did not impair contract)
- State v. Dixon, 159 Wn.2d 65, 147
P.3d 991 (Dec. 7, 2006) (dissenting, child’s prior statement
about lying was relevant and was admissible)
- State v. Easterlin, 159 Wn.2d 203,
149 P.3d 366 (Dec. 21, 2006) (dissenting, nexus between crime,
firearm, and defendant must be alleged and proved for enhancement)
- State v. Jones, 159 Wn.2d 231, 149
P.3d 636 (Dec 28, 2006) (dissenting, 6th Amendment requires offense
while on community placement must be found by jury)
- Cosmopolitan Eng’g Group v.
Ondeo Degremont Inc., 159 Wn.2d 292, 149 P.3d 666 (Dec 28, 2006)
(dissenting, under contractor’s bond statute, contractor may
be liable for attorney fees in excess of bond)
- State v. Stout (Det. of Stout),
159 Wn.2d 357, 150 P.3d 86 (Jan. 4, 2007) (dissenting, right to
confront witnesses against defendant applies to sex predator
proceedings)
- State v. Stockwell, 159 Wn.2d 394,
150 P.3d 82 (Jan. 4, 2007) (dissenting, 1st degree statutory rape
and 1st degree rape of a child are not legally comparable)
- State v. O’Neal, 159 Wn.2d
500, 150 P.3d 1121 (Jan 25, 2007) (dissenting, constructive
possession of firearm doesn’t prove nexus to crime)
- Pham v. City of Seattle, 159 Wn.2d
527, 151 P.3d 976 (Feb 1, 2007) (dissenting, discounting lodestar
attorney fees is devastating to civil rights plaintiffs)
- Valley/50th Ave LLC v. Stewart,
159 Wn.2d 736, 153 P.3d 186 (Mar 1, 2007) (dissenting, law firm did
not violate ethical duty when it negotiated a payment of their fee
with the client)
- State v. Conte, 159 Wn.2d 797, 154
P.3d 194 (Mar 15, 2007) (dissenting, failure to comply with Public
Disclosure Act merits civil, not criminal, penalty)
- State v. Watson, 160 Wn.2d 1, 154
P.3d 909 (Apr 5, 2007) (dissenting, sex offender should not have to
reregister after release from custody to same address)
- State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918,
155 P.3d 125 (Apr 5, 2007) (dissenting, expert testimony on
credibility should be excluded)
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of Seattle;
Ford Motor Co. v. City of Tacoma, 160 Wn.2d 32, 156 P.3d 185 (Apr
12, 2007) (dissenting, auto sales to dealer from manufacturer
occurred in Michigan and therefore cannot be taxed in Seattle or
Tacoma)
- State v. Surge, 160 Wn.2d 65, 156
P.3d 208 (Apr 19, 2007) (dissenting, collection of prisoner DNA
“search” under article I, § 7 of constitution)
- Sanders v. City of Seattle, 160
Wn.2d 198, 156 P.3d 874 (Apr 26 2007) (dissenting, prohibition of
picket signs at monorail station violates First Amendment)
- City of Medina v. Primm, 160 Wn.2d
268, 157 P.3d 379 (May 3, 2007) (dissenting, municipal courts have
no jurisdiction to try violations of other municipal codes)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Marshall, 160 Wn.2d 317, 157 P.3d 859 (May 10, 2007)
(dissenting, attorney discipline improper where no conflict of
interest)
- State v. Chenoweth, 160 Wn.2d 454,
158 P.3d 595 (May 24, 2007) (dissenting, negligent misrepresentation
of facts in warrant affidavit should be grounds to invalidate
warrant)
- In re Discipline of Dornay, 160
Wn.2d 671, 161 P.3d 333 (June 21, 2007) (dissenting, attorney should
not be disciplined for making statements which are literally true)
- Dep’t of Corrections v.
Daniel, 160 Wn.2d 786, 161 P.3d 372 (July 6, 2007) (dissenting,
prevailing party in arbitration should be entitled to prejudgment
interest from date of arbitration award)
- State v. Young, 160 Wn.2d 799, 161
P.3d 967 (July 12, 2007) (dissenting, evidence not admissible as
“excited utterance”)
- State v. Kronich, 160 Wn.2d 893,
161 P.3d 982 (July 12, 2007) (dissenting, DOL certification that
defendant’s driver license is suspended is testimonial and
inadmissible)
- State v. Mason, 160 Wn.2d 910, 162
P.3d 396 (July 19, 2007) (dissenting, violation of right to confront
not harmless, forfeiture by wrongdoing should not be adopted,
informing jury that death penalty not sought is reversible error)
- State v. Benn, 161 Wn.2d 256, 165
P.3d 1232 (Aug 23, 2007) (dissenting, blank verdict form is usually
implied acquittal and is subject to double jeopardy protection)
- State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303,
165 P.3d 1241 (Aug 30, 2007) (dissenting, this reasonable doubt
instruction violates due process)
- State v. Lord, 161 Wn.2d 276, 165
P.3d 1251 (Aug 30, 2007) (dissenting, exclusion of relevant defense
evidence is not harmless)
- City of Pasco v. Shaw, 161 Wn.2d
450, 166 P.3d 1157 (Sept 13, 2007) (dissenting, warrantless
residential searches are under color of law and violate state
constitution)
- In re Pers. Restraint of Borrero,
161 Wn.2d 532, 167 P.3d 1106 (Sept 13, 2007) (dissenting,
convictions violate double jeopardy)
- Olver v. Fowler, 161 Wn.2d 655,
168 P.3d 348 (Sept 20, 2007) (dissenting, our meretricious
relationship case law should not apply after both partners die)
- Colorado Structures v. Ins. Co. of
the West, 161 Wn.2d 577, 167 P.3d 1125 (Sept 20, 2007) (dissenting,
failure to declare default fatal to action on performance bond)
- State v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 168
P.3d 359 (Sept 27, 2007) (dissenting, excluding jurors for general
disagreement to death penalty is constitutional error)
- Stevens v. Brink’s Home Sec.
Inc., 162 Wn.2d 42, 169 P.3d 473 (Oct 18, 2007) (dissenting, vehicle
used to commute to job is not a “workplace”)
- In re PRP of Elmore, 162 Wn.2d
236, 172 P.3d 335 (Nov 21, 2007) (dissenting, 6th Amendment violated
when counsel is ineffective in capital case)
- In re PRP of Bowman, 162 Wn.2d
325, 172 P.3d 681(Nov 21, 2007) (dissenting, drive-by shooting
should not be predicate for second degree felony murder)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Day, 162 Wn.2d 527, 173 P.3d 915 (Dec 20, 2007) (dissenting,
suspension is presumptive sanction for sexual assault)
- In re Pers. Restraint of Dalluge,
162 Wash.2d 814, 177 P.3d 675 (Jan 17, 2008) (dissenting, when
community custody tolls the conditions also toll)
- Ventenbergs v. City of Seattle,
163 Wn.2d 92, 178 P.3d 960 (Feb 21, 2008) (dissenting, exclusive
waste hauling franchise violates privileges and immunities clause)
- McNabb v. Dep’t of
Corrections, 163 Wn.2d 393 180 P.3d 1257 (Apr 10, 2008) (dissenting,
force-feeding hunger striker violates constitution)
- State v. Phillip Hicks; State v.
Rashad Babbs, 163 Wn.2d 477, 181 P.3d 831 (April 24, 2008)
(dissenting, it is error to inform jury that the death penalty is
not sought and to remove African-American juror)
- State v. Ramos, 163 Wn.2d 654, 184
P.3d 1256 (June 12, 2008) (dissenting, double jeopardy bars retrial)
- In re Det. of Young, 163 Wn.2d
684, 185 P.3d 1180 (June 12, 2008) (dissenting, contempt not
on available sanction for refusal to submit to mental examination)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
against Trejo, 163 Wash.2d 701, 185 P.3d 1160 (June 12, 2008)
(dissenting, attorney should not be suspended because employee stole
from trust account)
- State v. Schwab, 163 Wn.2d 664,
185 P.3d 1151 (June 12, 2008) (dissenting, vacated conviction cannot
be resurrected)
- State v. Flores, 164 Wn.2d 1, 186
P.3d 1038 (June 26, 2008) (violation of right to confront is not
harmless)
- State v. Modica, 164 Wn.2d 83, 186
P.3d 1062 (July 10, 2008) (dissenting, privacy act applies to jail
telephones)
- In re PRP of Dyer, 164 Wn.2d 274,
189 P.3d 759 (Aug 7, 2008) (dissenting, improper to deny parole
because inmate refuses to confess guilt)
- State v. Eaton, 164 Wn.2d 461, 191
P.3d 1270 (Sep 11, 2008) (dissenting, conviction should be reversed
where charged with possessing wrong drug)
- Am. Legion Post #149 v.
Dep’t of Health, 164 Wn.2d 570, 192 P.3d 306 (Sep 11, 2008)
(dissenting, private club not bound by antismoking statute)
- Brutsche v. City of Kent, 164
Wn.2d 664, 193 P.3d 110 (Oct 2, 2008) (dissenting, police use of
battering ram on doors after offer of keys by property owner
presents an issue of fact whether tactic was necessary, and if so,
entitled the owner to just compensation under article I, section 16
for the damaging)
- State v. Warren, 165 Wn.2d 17, 195
P.3d 940 (Nov 20, 2008) (dissenting, prosecutorial misconduct is
reversible error and no contact order with wife violates right to
marriage)
- Griffin v. Thurston County, 165
Wn.2d 50, 196 P.3d 141 (Nov 20, 2008) (dissenting, on-site sewage
system conformed to county code)
- In re PRP of Bonds, 165 Wn.2d 135,
196 P.3d 672 (Nov 26, 2008) (dissenting, equitable tolling of time
to file PRP applies when court delays decision on original petition)
- City of Tukwila v. Garrett, 165
Wn.2d 162 196 P.3d 681 (Nov 26, 2008) (dissenting, municipal court
jury improperly impaneled when no residents of city are on jury)
- State v. Smith, 165 Wn.2d 511, 199
P.3d 386 (Jan 22, 2009) (dissenting, warrantless search of home
unconstitutional)
- State v. Daniels, 165 Wn.2d 627,
200 P.3d 711 (Feb 12, 2009) (dissenting, double jeopardy violation
when retried based on unable-to-agree instruction).
- WA State Major League Baseball
Stadium Pub. Facil. Dist. v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit
Constr., 165 Wn.2d 679, 202 P.3d 924 (Mar 5, 2009) (dissenting,
baseball stadium claim not exempt from 6-year statute of
limitations)
- State v. Kirwin, 165 Wn.2d 818,
203 P.3d 1044 (Mar 26, 2009) (dissenting, search of car incident to
arrest for littering is invalid)
- State v. Wright, 165 Wn.2d 783,
203 P.3d 1027 (Mar 26, 2009) (dissenting, double jeopardy bars
re-prosecution where jury does not return a verdict on first
prosecution)
- In re Marriage of Bernard, 165
Wn.2d 895, 204 P.3d 907 (Apr 9, 2009) (dissenting, prenuptial
agreement not procedurally unfair)
- State v. Powell,166 Wn.2d 73, 206
P.3d 321 (Apr 30, 2009) (dissenting, testimony regarding prior use
of drugs before burglary reversible error)
- State v. Thomas, 166 Wn.2d 380,
208 P.3d 1107 (June 11, 2009) (dissenting, jury improperly
instructed on aggravated murder factors and jury not race neutral)
- Morgan v. Kingen, 166 Wn.2d 526,
210 P.3d 995 (July 2, 2009) (dissenting, employees did not
“willfully” refuse to pay employees when forced into
involuntary bankruptcy by IRS)
- Det. of Anderson, 166 Wn.2d 543,
211 P.3d 994 (July 9, 2009) (dissenting, consensual sex is not a
“recent overt act” under sex predator statute)
- City of Bellevue v. Lee, 166 Wn.2d
581, 210 P.3d 1011 (July 9, 2009) (dissenting, driver license
suspension statute offends due process)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
Against Vanderveen, 166 Wn.2d 594, 211 P.3d 1008 (July 16, 2009)
(dissenting, failure to file form with IRS merits suspension because
it is not dishonest)
- State v. McCormick, 166 Wn.2d 689,
213 P.3d 32 (Aug 6, 2009) (dissenting, revocation of community
release for violating a condition should require state to prove
defendant reasonably should have known he was in violation at time)
- City of Seattle v. St. John, 166
Wn.2d 941, 215 P.3d 194 (Sep 10, 2009) (dissenting, refusal of
consent to take breath sample in DUI arrest precludes search warrant
to take blood sample)
- State v. Kilgore, 167 Wn.2d 28,
216 P.3d 393 (Sep 24, 2009) (dissenting, finality of judgment for
Blakely purposes is when trial court acts on remand)
- Det. of Moore, 167 Wn.2d 113, 216
P.3d 1015 (Oct 1, 2009) (dissenting, to prove a person is currently
dangerous, sexually violent predator expert testimony must
demonstrate, absent commitment, the individual will reoffend in the
near future)
- State v. O’Hara, 167 Wn.2d
91, 217 P.3d 756 (Oct 1, 2009) (dissenting, “malicious
trespass or other malicious interference with . . . personal
property” does not require evil intent)
- Det. of Strand, 167 Wn.2d 180, 217
P.3d 1159 (Oct 8, 2009) (dissenting, government may not compel an
evaluation under the Sexually Violent Predator statute prior to
filing the SVP petition)
- Abbey Road Group LLC v. City of
Bonney Lake, 167 Wn.2d 242, 218 P.3d 180 (Oct 8, 2009) (dissenting,
local ordinances which deny the property owner the right to vest
when he sees fit violates due process)
- Det. of Fair, 167 Wn.2d 357, 219
P.3d 89 (Oct 22, 2009) (dissenting, in sexually violent predator
proceeding, proof of a recent overt act is required if person
released from confinement after sex offense but before SVP petition
filed)
- In re Pers. Restraint of Duncan,
167 Wn.2d 398, 219 P.3d 666 (Oct 22, 2009) (dissenting, evidentiary
errors in Sexually Violent Predator trial)
- State v. Webb, 167 Wn.2d 470, 219
P.3d 695 (Oct 29, 2009) (dissenting, abatement ab initio doctrine is
still good law and makes sense)
- State v. Pugh, 167 Wn.2d 825, 225
P.3d 892 (Dec 31, 2009) (dissenting, “face to face”
means “face to face” in state constitution’s
confrontation clause)
- Schnall v. AT&T Wireless
Servs, 168 Wn.2d 125, 225 P.3d 929 (Jan 21, 2010) (dissenting, class
action should have been certified)
- State v. Fry, 168 Wn.2d 1, 228
P.3d 1 (Jan 21, 2010) (dissenting, no probable cause for warrant to
search for marijuana)
- State v. Gamble, 168 Wn.2d 161,
225 P.3d 973 (Jan 28, 2010) (dissenting, other possible charges
merge with felony murder)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
Against Cramer, 168 Wn.2d 220, 225 P.3d 881 (Feb 11, 2010)
(dissenting, lawyer did not act dishonestly and should be suspended,
not disbarred)
- State v. Gonzalez, 168 Wn.2d 256,
226 P.3d 131 (Feb 18, 2010) (dissenting, second restitution order
violated statute and double jeopardy)
- State v. Sibert, 168 Wn.2d 306,
230 P.3d 142 (Feb 25, 2010) (dissenting, State must state each
element of the crime in its to-convict instruction)
- In re Personal Restraint of Clark,
168 Wn.2d 581, 230 P.3d 156 (Apr 8, 2010) (dissenting, judgment is
invalid on face, therefore PRP is timely)
- SEIU Healthcare v. Gregoire, 168
Wn.2d 593, 229 P.3d 774 (Apr 8, 2010) (concurring in dissent,
governor should have been ordered to include health care workers’
pay raises in budget, and case should have been decided promptly
with opinion to follow)
- Lawson v, City of Pasco, 168 Wn.2d
675, 230 P.3d 1038 (Apr 15, 2010) (dissenting, Pasco ordinance which
bars RVs in trailer parks violates statute )
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
Against Preszler, 169 Wn2d 1, 232 P.3d 1118 (June 17, 2010)
(dissenting, suspend lawyer for 12 months)
- S. Tacoma Way, LLC v. State, 169
Wn.2d 118, 233 P.3d 871 (June 24, 2010) (dissenting, Department of
Transportation sale of land without statutory notice is ultra vires)
- Sound Infiniti, Inc. v. Snyder,
169 Wn.2d 199, 237 P.3d 241 (July 22, 2010) (dissenting,
shareholders divested by reverse stock split have standing to sue)
- G-P Gypsum Corp. v. Dep’t of
Revenue, 169 Wn.2d 304, 237 P.3d 256 (July 29, 2010) (dissenting,
Tacoma’s natural gas use tax inapplicable when delivery first
taken outside of Tacoma)
- Proctor v. Huntington, -- Wn.2d
--, 238 P.3d 1117 (Aug 19, 2010) (dissenting, court is without
authority to transfer property to trespasser who builds structure on
another’s property)
- State v. Bunker, -- Wn.2d --, 238
P.3d 487 (Aug 26, 2010) (dissenting, statute does not criminalize
all violations of no-contact orders, only those where arrest is
required)
- State v. Kintz, -- Wn.2d --, 238
P.3d 470 (Aug 26, 2010) (dissenting, the phrase “separate
occasions” in stalking statute is ambiguous and must be
strictly construed)
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding
Against Shepard, -- Wn.2d --, -- P.3d --, 2010 WL 3504857 (Sep 9,
2010) (dissenting, lawyer should be suspended six months rather than
two years)
- Guillen v. Contreras, -- Wn.2d --,
238 P.3d 1168 (Sep 9, 2010) (dissenting, limiting award of
reasonable attorney fees in forfeiture proceeding is error)
- City of Port Angeles v. Our Water,
Our Choice, -- Wn.2d --, -- P.3d --, 2010 WL 3705236 (Sep 23, 2010)
(dissenting, power of local initiative must be protected)
- Hudson v. Hapner, -- Wn.2d --, --
P.3d --, 2010 WL 3705230 (Sep 23, 2010) (dissenting, request for
trial de novo can be withdrawn at any trial)
- City of Aberdeen v. Regan, --
Wn.2d --, -- P.3d --, 2010 WL 3785299 (Sep 30, 2010) (dissenting,
there is no violation of parole requiring “no criminal
violations of law” where parolee is acquitted)
- State v. Ish, -- Wn.2d --, -- P.3d
--, 2010 WL 3911355 (Oct 7, 2010) (dissenting, reference to “truth
telling” condition of plea agreement not harmless)
- Port Angeles v. Our Water Our Choice 170 Wash. 2Nd 1 (2010) (dissenting, anti floridation initiative properly before voters.)
- Hudson V. Harper 170 Wash. 2Nd 22 (2010) (dissenting, party has right to withdraw request for trial de novo.)
- Aberdeen v. Regan 170 Wash. 2Nd 103 Dissent: Acquittal of criminal charge bars parole revocation based on “violations of law”.
- State v. Ish 170 Wash. 2Nd 189 Dissent: Reference to “truth telling” condition of informant's plea agreement by prosecution was not harmless error.
- PRP of Adolph 170 Wash. 2Nd 556 Dissent: Copy of DOL driving record abstract insufficient to prove criminal history.
- State v. Hager 171 Wash. 2Nd 151 Dissent: Police testimony on veracity of defendant violates right to fair trial and is prejudicial.
- Sehnall v. AT&T 171 Wash. 2Nd 260 Dissent: Trial court abused it discretion when it denied nationwide certification as a class action.
- Detention of West 171 Wash. 2Nd 383 Dissent: Trial court erred when it allowed inadmissible testimony from state's witness in sex predator trial and erred again when it quashed a defense subpoena for state expert's records.
- State v. Martin 171 Wash. 2Nd 521 Dissent: State argument that defendant “tailored” his testimony based on pictiral discovery violated Art. 1 § 22 of state constitution.
- (In Re: Dependency of KNJ 171 Wash. 2Nd 568)
- Seattle v. May 171 Wash. 2Nd 847 Dissent: A permanent protection requires an affirmative finding for it to extend beyond one year. This one didn't.
Home