Opinions by
Current through June 24, 2010
Published opinions available in most law libraries and
LegalWA.org
Recently published are also available on the Court’s
Internet website
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions
I.
Majority Opinions
|
1
|
State
ex rel. T.B. v. CPC Fairfax Hosp., 129 Wn.2d 439, 918 P.2d 497 (1996) (for majority,
minors committed to mental hospitals by their parents have right to judicial
review) |
|
|
2
|
Sheldon
v. Fettig, 129 Wn.2d 601, 919 P.2d 1209 (1996) (for majority, substitute
service of process sufficient when left with defendant’s brother at the family
home) |
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
Jain
v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 130 Wn.2d 688, 926 P.2d 923 (1996) (for
majority, child rendered quadriplegic by car crash may collect insurance
benefits based on invalidation of UIM exclusion) |
|
|
5
|
Nelson
v. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., 131 Wn.2d 523, 936 P.2d 1123 (1997) (for
majority, protects newspaper’s First Amendment Right to reassign reporter for
editorial reasons) |
|
|
6
|
Dioxin/Organochlorine
Center v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 131 Wn.2d 345, 932 P.2d 158 (1997)
(for majority, activity categorically exempt under SEPA is really exempt) |
|
|
7
|
Black
v. Dept. of Labor & Indus., 131 Wn.2d 547, 933 P.2d 1025 (1997) (for
majority, injured worker entitled to have his case heard on merits where
service of process made on attorney for State) |
|
|
8
|
Wallace
v. Evans, 131 Wn.2d 572, 934 P.2d 662 (1997) (for majority, trial court may
not unilaterally dismiss a civil action for inaction by the parties after
plaintiffs note case for trial) |
|
|
9
|
Malyon
v. |
|
|
10
|
State
v. Becker, 132 Wn.2d 54, 935 P.2d 1321 (1997) (for majority, school zone
sentencing enhancement unconstitutional when presence of adult education
facility not known or reasonably knowable) |
|
|
11
|
State
v. Castellanos, 132 Wn.2d 94, 935 P.2d 1353 (1997) (for majority, affirming
drug conviction and holding trial court did not err when it allowed jury
unlimited access to body wire tape recordings of drug transactions during
deliberations) |
|
|
12
|
State
v. Parker, 132 Wn.2d 182, 937 P.2d 575 (1997) (for majority, resentencing
necessary where sentencing judge imposed exceptional sentence based on incorrectly
calculated standard range) |
|
|
13
|
Pasco
Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of |
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
15
|
State
v. Rohrich, 132 Wn.2d 472, 939 P.2d 697 (1997) (for majority, Confrontation
Clause requires child to actually testify on substance of allegation before
admitting hearsay under RCW 9A.44.120(2)(a) which allows hearsay if the child
“[t]estifies at the proceedings”) |
|
|
16
|
State
v. Hairston, 133 Wn.2d 534, 946 P.2d 397 (1997) (for majority, constitutional
right to counsel requires appellate court to independently review the entire
record before releasing appointed counsel and dismissing the appeal as
frivolous in Anders situation) |
|
|
17
|
Price
v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Wash., 133 Wn.2d 490, 946 P.2d 388 (1997) (for
majority, court lacks jurisdiction in arbitration matter to decide setoff and
parties must resolve question by agreement or commence separate action) |
|
|
18
|
Central
Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. Barbee, 133 Wn.2d 509, 946 P.2d 760 (1997)
(for majority, buyer of goods may bring indemnity action against seller for
liability incurred to third party for defect in goods and the statute of
limitations on such action begins to run when the buyer pays or is obligated
to pay the liability) |
|
|
19
|
State
v. Hardy, 133 Wn.2d 701, 946 P.2d 1175 (1997) (for majority, prior drug
convictions are generally inadmissible to impeach criminal defendant under ER
609(a)) |
|
|
20
|
In
re Marriage of Briscoe, 134 Wn.2d 344, 949 P.2d 1388 (1998) (for majority,
valid statute requiring offset for social security payments made to children
is necessarily incorporated into settlement agreement in the absence of express
exclusion of the provision) |
|
|
21
|
Waggoner
v. Ace Hardware Corp., 134 Wn.2d 748, 953 P.2d 88 (1998) (for majority, RCW
49.60.180 does not prohibit employment discrimination based on cohabiting or
dating relationships) |
|
|
22
|
Mission
Springs v. City of Spokane, 134 Wn.2d 947, 954 P.2d 250 (1998) (for majority,
a city council’s interference with grading permit subjects city and council
to liability for due process violation under civil rights act |
|
|
23
|
State
v. Hickman, 135 Wn.2d 97, 954 P.2d 900 (1998) (for majority, venue of the
crime becomes an element for the state to prove under the law of the case
doctrine when given to the jury in the “to convict” instruction) |
|
|
24
|
Millay
v. Cam, 135 Wn.2d 193, 955 P.2d 791 (1998) (for majority, clarifying the
procedures for statutory redemption and allowing equitable tolling of
redemption period when the redemptioner in possession submits a grossly
exaggerated statement of the sum required to redeem) |
|
|
25
|
State
ex rel. Public Disclosure Com'n v. 119 Vote No! Committee, 135 Wn.2d 618, 957
P.2d 691 (1998) (for majority, statute regulating false political speech
violates the First Amendment) |
|
|
26
|
Greengo
v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co., 135 Wn.2d 799,
959 P.2d 657 (1998) (for majority, three-car accident may be two
“accidents” for purposes of insurance coverage) |
|
|
27
|
Vintage
Const. Co. v. City of |
|
|
28
|
Fisher v. Allstate, 136
Wn.2d 240, 961 P.2d 350 (1998) (for majority, underinsurance motorist carrier
is bound by the results of an arbitration between its insured and tortfeasor
when carrier did not participate but had notice and opportunity to intervene) |
|
|
29
|
State
v. Ivie, 136 Wn.2d 173, 961 P.2d 941 (1998) (for
majority, captain’s mast punishment bars subsequent state prosecution for
same crime) |
|
|
30
|
McCoy
v. American Suzuki Motor Corp., 136 Wn.2d 350, 961 P.2d 952 (1998) (for
majority, rescuer doctrine applies to product liability action) |
|
|
31
|
Kottler
v. State, 136 Wn.2d 437, 963 P.2d 834 (1998) (for majority, joint and several
liability requires judgment against tortfeasor) |
|
|
32
|
Martini
v. Boeing Co., 137 Wn.2d 357, 971 P.2d 45 (1999) (for majority, employee with
successful discrimination claim may recover damages for front and back pay) |
|
|
33
|
State
v. Bencivenga, 137 Wn.2d 703, 974 P.2d 832 (1999) (for majority, where
criminal defendant’s exculpatory story is unreasonable, conviction is
affirmed) |
|
|
34
|
State
v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 979 P.2d 833 (1999) (No. 65801-3) (for majority,
pretextual stop violates Washington Constitution) |
|
|
35
|
Miller
v. |
|
|
36
|
State
v. Thomas Clark, 139 Wn.2d 152, 985 P.2d 377 (Oct. 7, 1999) (for majority, hearsay
evidence from testifying child does not violate Confrontation Clause
guarantee) |
|
|
37
|
State
v. Sabas Cruz, 139 Wn.2d 186, 985 P.2d 384 (Oct. 7, 1999) (for majority,
felony “washout” amendments not retroactive) |
|
|
38
|
Allstate
Ins. Co. v. Batacan, 139 Wn.2d 443, 986 P.2d 823 (Oct. 21, 1999) (No.
66493-5) (for majority, UIM coverage available to motorist injured by
multiple tortfeasors when one is uninsured) |
|
|
39
|
State
v. Barnett, 134 Wn.2d 462, 987 P.2d 626 (Oct. 28, 1999) (No. 67171-1) (for
majority, first degree burglary may not be a “crime against a person” for
purposes of community placement statute) |
|
|
40
|
J.R.
Simplot v. Knight, 139 Wn.2d 534, 988 P.2d 955 (Nov 18, 1999) (No. 67652-6)
(for majority, litigating the fine points:
the meaning of the hyphen) |
|
|
41
|
Harbour
Village Apartments v. City of |
|
|
42
|
Staats
v. Brown, 139 Wn.2d 757, 991 P.2d 615 ( |
|
|
43
|
Smith
v. |
|
|
44
|
Roberts
v. |
|
|
45
|
Kucera
v. DOT, 140 Wn.2d 200, 995 P.2d 63 ( |
|
|
46
|
State
v. McCarty, 140 Wn.2d 420, 998 P.2d 296 ( |
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
48
|
In
re Disciplinary Proceeding against Michael Tasker,141 Wn.2d 557, 9 P.3d
822 ( |
|
|
49
|
Int’l
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 46 v. Trig Electric
Construction Co., 142 Wn.2d 431, 13 P.3d 622 (Nov 16, 2000) (for majority) |
|
|
50
|
Weyerhaeuser
Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 142 Wn.2d 654, 15 P.3d. 115 ( |
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
53
|
In
re the Pers. Restraint of Robert Perkins, 143 Wn.2d 261, 19 P.3d. 1027 ( |
|
|
54
|
Dinh
v. Salins, 143 Wn.2d 378, 20 P.3d. 936 ( |
|
|
55
|
State
v. |
|
|
56
|
State
v. Vreen, 143 Wn.2d 923, 26 P.3d 236 ( |
|
|
57
|
State
v. Williams, 144 Wn.2d 197, 26 P.3d 890 ( |
|
|
58
|
Panorama
Village Condominium Owners Ass’n Bd. of Directors v. Allstate Ins. Co., 144
Wn.2d 130, 26 P.3d 910 (July 12, 2001) (for majority, insurance coverage for “hidden
decay” means decay which is out of sight, not necessarily decay which is
reasonably anticipated) |
|
|
59
|
State
v. Marshall (Henry Lewis), 144 Wn.2d 266, 27 P.3d 192 ( |
|
|
60
|
In
re Bang D. Nguyen, 144 Wn.2d 516, 29 P.3d 689 ( |
|
|
61
|
State
v. Thomas Reid, 144 Wn.2d 621, 30 P.3d 465 ( |
|
|
62
|
City
of |
|
|
63
|
Guardianship
Estate of Danny Keffeler v. DSHS, 145 Wn.2d 1, 32 P.3d 267 ( |
|
|
64
|
Snyder
v. Med. Serv. Corp. of E. Wash., 145 Wn.2d 233, 35 P.3d 1158 (Dec 13, 2001)
(for majority, employee’s disability and outrage claim against employer fail
as a matter of law) |
|
|
65
|
Polley
v. Stokes, 145 Wn.2d 341, 37 P.3d 1211 ( |
|
|
66
|
Overton
v. Consolidated Ins. Co., 145 Wn.2d 417, 38 P.3d 322 ( |
|
|
67
|
State
v. Darden, 145 Wn.2d 612, 41 P.3d 1189 ( |
|
|
68
|
In
re Det. of Petersen, In re Det. of Thorell, 145 Wn.2d 789, 42 P.3d 952 (Mar
21, 2002) (for majority, “probable cause” in annual sex predator review
requires prima facie showing of eligibility for release, and discovery
permitted) |
|
|
69
|
Firth
v. Lu, 146 Wn.2d 608, 49 P.3d 117 ( |
|
|
70
|
Olivine
Corp. v. United Capitol Ins. Co., 147 Wn.2d 148, 52 P.3d 494 (Aug 22, 2002)
(for majority, premium finance company may not cancel insurance policy absent
notice to insured) |
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
72
|
State
v. Lopez, 147 Wn.2d 515, 55 P.3d 609 ( |
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
74
|
All
Around Underground Inc. v. State, 148 Wn.2d 145, 60 P.3d 53 ( |
|
|
75
|
New
Hampshire Indemnity Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, 148 Wn.2d 929, 64 P.3d
1239 ( |
|
|
76
|
Young
v. |
|
|
77
|
Shoop
v. |
|
|
78
|
Kloepfel
v. Bokor, 149 Wn.2d 192, 66 P.3d 630 ( |
|
|
79
|
State
v. Kindsvogel, 149 Wn.2d 477, 69 P.3d 870 ( |
|
|
80
|
State
v. DeRyke, 149 Wn.2d 906, 73 P.3d 1000 ( |
|
|
81
|
American
States Ins. Co. v. Symes of Silverdale, 150 Wn.2d 462, 78 P.3d 1266 ( |
|
|
82
|
Smith
v. Safeco Ins. Co., 150 Wn.2d 478, 78 P.3d 1274 ( |
|
|
83
|
Malted
Mousse v. Steinmetz, 150 Wn.2d 518, 79 P.3d 1154 ( |
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
85
|
State
v. Goodman, 150 Wn.2d 774, 83 P.3d 410 ( |
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
87
|
Butzberger
v. Foster, 151 Wn.2d 396, 89 P.3d 689 ( |
|
|
88
|
City
of |
|
|
89
|
State
v. Costich, 152 Wn.2d 463, 98 P.3d 795 (Oct 7, 2004) (for majority,
settlement offer in condemnation action 30 days before trial is valid) |
|
|
90
|
Schrom
& Bloomfield v. Board for Volunteer Firefighters, 153 Wn.2d 19, 100 P.3d
814 ( |
|
|
91
|
In
re Marriage of Langham & Kolde, 153 Wn.2d 553, 106 P.3d 212 ( |
|
|
92
|
In
re Parentage of C.A.M.A., 154 Wn.2d 52, 109 P.3d 405 ( |
|
|
93
|
State
v. Pulfrey, 154 Wn.2d 517, 111 P.3d 1162 ( |
|
|
94
|
Prison
Legal News Inc. v. Washington State Department of Corrections, 154 Wn.2d 628,
115 P.3d 316 ( |
|
|
95
|
Bunch
v. King County Dep’t of Youth Servs., 155 Wn.2d 165, 116 P.3d 381 ( |
|
|
96
|
State
v. Byron Lee Brown, 154 Wn.2d 787, 117 P.3d 336 ( |
|
|
97
|
Spokane
Research & Def. Fund v. City of |
|
|
98
|
State
v. Zachary Tinker, 155 Wn.2d 219, 118 P.3d 885, ( |
|
|
99
|
Association
of Washington Business v. Department of Revenue, 155 Wn.2d 430, 120 P.3d 46 ( |
|
|
100
|
State
v. Punsalan and State v. Hanson, 156 Wn.2d 875, 133 P.3d 934 ( |
|
|
101
|
Osborn
v. |
|
|
102
|
Heg
v. Alldredge ,157 Wn.2d 154, 137 P.3d 9 ( |
|
|
103
|
In
re Estate of Kordon, 157 Wn.2d 206, 137 P.3d 16 ( |
|
|
104
|
Koenig
v. City of |
|
|
105
|
Scoccolo
Construction, Inc. v. City of Renton, 158 Wn.2d 508, 145 P.3d 371 (Oct 26,
2006) (for majority, utilities were “acting for” city, thus contract clause
providing no damages for delay is invalid) |
|
|
106
|
Wright
v. Colville Tribal Enterprises Corp., 159 Wn.2d 108, 147 P.3d 1275 ( |
|
|
107
|
Ongom
v. State, 159 Wn.2d 132, 148 P.3d 1029 ( |
|
|
108
|
Sleasman
v. City of |
|
|
109
|
Nelson
v. Appleway Chevrolet Inc., 160 Wn.2d 173, 157 P.3d
847 ( |
|
|
110
|
State
v. Daniels, 160 Wn.2d 256, 156 P.3d 905 (May 3, 2007) (for majority, jeopardy
doesn’t terminate when no implied acquittal; but see dissent to same opinion, 165 Wn.2d 627 (2009)) |
|
|
111
|
Bank
of America NA v. Prestance Corp., 160 Wn.2d 560, 160 P.3d 17 ( |
|
|
112
|
State
v. Womac, 160 Wn.2d 643, 160 P.3d 40 ( |
|
|
113
|
In
re Pers. Restraint of Skylstad, 160 Wn.2d 944, 162 P.3d 413 ( |
|
|
114
|
Crafts
v. Pitts, 161 Wn.2d 16, 162 P.3d 382 ( |
|
|
115
|
In
re Postsentence Review of Leach, 161 Wn.2d 180, 163 P.3d 782 ( |
|
|
116
|
Robert
Noble v. A&R Environmental Servs., 140 Wn App 29, 164 P.3d 519 ( |
|
|
117
|
In
re Termination of S.H., B.H., and M.H. (unpub), 2007 WL
2340792, 2007 Wn. App. LEXIS 2456 ( |
|
|
118
|
Qwest
Corp. v. City of |
|
|
119
|
State
v. |
|
|
120
|
State
v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 167 P.3d 1156 (Sept 27, 2007) (for majority, search
warrant violates 4th Amendment’s particularity requirement) |
|
|
121
|
State
v. Knight, 162 Wn.2d 806, 174 P.3d 1167 (Jan 17, 2008) (for majority, vacating conviction remedy
for double jeopardy violation) |
|
|
122
|
In
re the Det. of Sheldon Martin, 163 Wn.2d 501, 182 P.3d 951 (May 1, 2008) (for
majority, sex predator petition erroneously filed in Thurston County must be
dismissed) |
|
|
123
|
York
v. Wahkiakum Sch. Dist. #200, 163 Wn.2d 297, 178 P.3d 995 (Mar 13, 2008) (for
majority, random and suspicionless drug testing of students violates state
constitution) |
|
|
124
|
State
v. Eisfeldt,163 Wn.2d 628, 185 P.3d 580 (June 5, 2008) (for majority, we
reject the federal private search doctrine and suppress the evidence) |
|
|
125
|
TCAP
Corp. v. Gervin, 163 Wn.2d 645, 185 P.3d 589 (June 5, 2008) (for majority,
when foreign judgment expires in foreign jurisdiction, it cannot be enforced
here) |
|
|
126
|
Young v. Young, 164 Wn.2d 477, 191 P.3d 1258 (Sep 11,
2008) (for majority, measure of recovery in unjust enrichment case) |
|
|
127
|
Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce Co., 164 Wn.2d 545, 192 P.3d 886
(Sep 18, 2008) (for majority, question of fact as to whether bail bonding
company entitled to refund of money) |
|
|
128
|
City of Arlington v. Central Puget Sound Growth Mgmt.
Hrgs. Bd., 164 Wn.2d 768, 193 P.3d 1077 (Oct 9, 2008) (for majority, county
amendment of comprehensive plan did not violate growth management act) |
|
|
129
|
Yousoufian v. Office of Ron Sims, 165 Wash.2d 439, 200
P.3d 232 (Jan 15, 2009) (for majority, trial court abused its discretion by
awarding only $15 per day penalty in Public Records Act proceeding) |
|
|
130
|
Michael v. Mosquera-Lacy, 165 Wn.2d 596, 200 P.3d 695 (Feb
5, 2009) (for majority, no Consumer Protection Act claim for malpractice) |
|
|
131
|
State v. Garvin, 166 Wn.2d 242, 207 P.3d 1266 (May 28, 2009)
(for majority, stop and frisk search does not permit pocket squeeze) |
|
|
132
|
Homestreet, Inc. v. Dep’t of Revenue, 166 Wn.2d 444-, 210
P.3d 297 (June 18, 2009) (for majority, B&O tax on residential mortgage
lender invalid) |
|
|
133
|
Estate of Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc., 166
Wn.2d 489, 210 P.3d 308 (June 25, 2009) (for majority, mechanics lien
attaches to improvements on government owned property and has priority as of
the date materials are first delivered) |
|
|
134
|
Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLC,166 Wn.2d 510, 210
P.3d 318 (June 25, 2009) (for majority, real estate contract may lawfully
limit buyers’ remedies under these facts) |
|
|
135
|
State v. Eriksen, 166 Wn.2d 953, 216 P.3d 382 (Sep 17,
2009), opinion withdrawn (July 7, 2010) (for majority, tribal police officer
may pursue vehicle in fresh pursuit off the reservation) |
|
|
136
|
State v. Kenyon, 167 Wn.2d 130, 216 P.3d 1024 (Oct 1,
2009) (for majority, violation of the speedy trial rule requires dismissal) |
|
|
137
|
State v. King, 167 Wn.2d 324, 219 P.3d 642 (Oct 15, 2009)
(for majority, police cannot arrest out of jurisdiction) |
|
|
138
|
Magana v. Hyundai Motor Am., 167 Wn.2d 570, 220 P.3d 191
(Nov 25, 2009) (for majority, default judgment against Hyundai reinstated for
discovery abuse) |
|
|
139
|
State v. Harrington, 167 Wn.2d 656, 222 P.3d 92 (Dec 10,
2009) (for majority, warrantless search of person not consensual when
progressive intrusion and violates state constitution) |
|
|
140
|
State v. Valdez, 167 Wn.2d 761, 224 P.3d 751 (Dec 24,
2009) (for majority, warrantless search of automobile limited to actual
officer safety or prevent destruction
of evidence which prompted stop) |
|
|
141
|
In re Welfare of C.S., 168 Wn.2d 51, 225 P.3d 953 (for
majority, parent may not have parental rights terminated where state offered
no services to correct parental deficiencies, if any) |
|
|
142
|
Clayton v. Wilson, 168 Wn.2d 57, 227 P.3d 278 (for
majority, judgment for tort runs against tortfeasor and marital community
when committed while managing community business) |
|
|
143
|
State
v. Sieyes, 168 Wn.2d 276, 225 P.3d 995 (Feb 18, 2010) (for majority, Second
Amendment applies to states) |
|
|
144
|
State
v. Osman, 168 Wn.2d 632, 229 P.3d 729 (Mar 25, 2010) (for majority, in a
court of limited jurisdiction, loss of material part of record requires new
trial) |
|
|
145
|
State
v. Vance, 168 Wn.2d 754, 230 P.3d 1055 (May 6, 2010) (for majority,
exceptional sentence did not violate right to trial by jury) |
|
|
146
|
McCurry
v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, -- Wn.2d --, -- P.3d –, 2010 WL
2521772 (June 24, 2010) (for majority,
federal fact pleading standards to not apply in Washington state courts and
federal law does not preempt this claim) |
|
II. Concurring Opinions
|
||
|
147
|
State v. Ross, 129 Wn.2d 279, 916
P.2d 405 (1996) (concurring, withdrawal of a guilty plea and specific
performance are alternative remedies available to defendant at his choosing
when a criminal plea agreement is breached or is involuntary) |
|
|
148
|
Felt
v. McCarthy, 130 Wn.2d 203, 922 P.2d 90 (1996) (concurring, “frustration of
purpose” doctrine may apply where purchased land is unforeseeably declared a
wetland) |
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
150
|
State
v. Crediford, 130 Wn.2d 747, 927 P.2d 1129 (1996) (concurring, DUI conviction
on statute which defines DUI as being drunk 2 hours after driving
invalid) |
|
|
151
|
In
re PRP of Johnson, 131 Wn.2d 558, 933 P.2d 1019 (1997) (concurring, Court of
Appeals only has jurisdiction to transfer and not dismiss redundant PRPs) |
|
|
152
|
Louisiana-Pacific
Corp. v. Asarco Inc., 131 Wn.2d 587, 934 P.2d 685 (1997) (concurring,
prevailing party may be awarded reasonably necessary expenses of litigation
in addition to attorneys fees) |
|
|
153
|
In
re Marriage of Littlefield, 133 Wn.2d 39, 940 P.2d 1362 (1997) (concurring,
the trial court lacked authority to order custodial mother to return to
|
|
|
154
|
Noble
Manor Co. v. |
|
|
155
|
CLEAN
v. City of Spokane, 133 Wn.2d 455, 947 P.2d 1169 (1997) (concurring, while a
parking garage is no constitutional emergency, in light of previous ruling that
a baseball stadium is an emergency we must follow precedent until overruled) |
|
|
156
|
State
v. Groom, 133 Wn.2d 679, 947 P.2d 240 (1997) (concurring, statute making it a
crime to conduct a warrantless residential search contains no exceptions) |
|
|
157
|
Lindberg
v. |
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
159
|
City
of |
|
|
160
|
Matter
of Pearsall‑Stipek, 136 Wn.2d 255, 961 P.2d 343
(1998) (concurring, res judicata requires identity of parties, not interest) |
|
|
161
|
State
v. Shultz, 138 Wn.2d 638, 980 P.2d 1265 (1999) (concurring, constitutionality
of statutes reviewed de novo) |
|
|
162
|
Key
Design v. Moser, 138 Wn.2d 875, 983 P.2d 653 (1999) (concurring, statute of frauds
should not apply to purchase and sale agreements) |
|
|
163
|
Washington
State Republican Party v. State Public Disclosure Comm’n, 141 Wn.2d 245, 4
P.3d 808 (July 27, 2000) (concurring, award of reasonable attorney fees under
civil rights statute available where official functions are enjoined) |
|
|
164
|
Manufactured
Housing Communities v. State, 142 Wn.2d 347, 13 P.3d 183 ( |
|
|
165
|
Furfaro
v. City of |
|
|
166
|
City
of |
|
|
167
|
Vasquez
v. |
|
|
168
|
State
v. Fisher, 145 Wn.2d 209, 35 P.3d 366 ( |
|
|
169
|
The
Benchmark Land Company v. City of |
|
|
170
|
State
v. Smith (Wallace Michael), 148 Wn.2d 122, 59 P.3d 74 ( |
|
|
171
|
State
v. Vasquez, 148 Wn.2d 303, 59 P.3d 648 ( |
|
|
172
|
Michak
v. Transnation Title Insurance Co., 148 Wn.2d 788, 64 P.3d 22 ( |
|
|
173
|
In
re Disciplinary Proceeding against Thomas Brothers, 149 Wn.2d 575, 70 P.3d
940 ( |
|
|
174
|
State
v. Garza, 150 Wn.2d 360, 77 P.3d 347 ( |
|
|
175
|
Grant
County Fire Prot. Dist. No. 5 v. City of Moses Lake, 150 Wn.2d 791, 83 P.3d
419 ( |
|
|
176
|
State
v. Mullin-Coston, 152 Wn.2d 107, 95 P.3d 321 ( |
|
|
177
|
Saddle
Mtn Minerals v. Joshi, 152 Wn.2d 242, 95 P.3d 1236 ( |
|
|
178
|
State
v. Daniel Hughes, 154 Wn.2d 118, 110 P.3d 192 ( |
|
|
179
|
State
v. Michael Evans, 154 Wn.2d 438, 114 P.3d 627 ( |
|
|
180
|
Grundy
v. Brack Family Trust, 155 Wn.2d 1, 117 P.3d 1089 (July 28, 2005) (concurring
in part, dissenting in part, failure to challenge permit under LUPA for
public nuisance claim and common enemy doctrine bars private nuisance claims) |
|
|
181
|
Viking
Properties v. Holm, 155 Wn.2d 112, 118 P.3d 322 ( |
|
|
182
|
State
v. Gurske, 155 Wn.2d 134, 118 P.3d 333 ( |
|
|
183
|
In re
Disciplinary Proceeding against Haley, 156 Wn.2d 324, 126 P.3d 1262 (Jan 26,
2006) (concurring, RPC 4.2(a) exempts self-represented lawyers) |
|
|
184
|
State
v. Tracey Jade Johnston, 156 Wn.2d 355, 127 P.3d 707 ( |
|
|
185
|
State
v. Linton, 156 Wn.2d 777, 132 P.3d 127 ( |
|
|
186
|
State
v. Levy, 156 Wn.2d 709, 132 P.3d 1076 ( |
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
188
|
State
v. Zhao, 157 Wn.2d 188, 137 P.3d 835 ( |
|
|
189
|
State
v. Devin, 158 Wn.2d 157, 142 P.3d 599 ( |
|
|
190
|
Okeson
v. City of |
|
|
191
|
State
v. Pillatos, 159 Wn.2d 459, 150 P.3d 1130 ( |
|
|
192
|
Udall
v. TD Escrow Servs, Inc., 159 Wn.2d 903, 154 P.3d 882 ( |
|
|
193
|
Arkison
v. Ethan Allen, Inc., 160 Wn.2d 535, 160 P.3d 13 ( |
|
|
194
|
State
v. Watt, 160 Wn.2d 626, 160 P.3d 640 ( |
|
|
195
|
State
v. Kirkpatrick, 160 Wn.2d 873, 161 P.3d 990 ( |
|
|
196
|
Beal
Bank SSB v. Sarich, 161 Wn.2d 544, 167 P.3d 555 ( |
|
|
197
|
State
v. Posey, 161 Wn.2d 638, 167 P.3d 560 (Sept 20, 2007) (concurring in part,
dissenting in part, email from alleged victim was relevant to consent an |
|
|
198
|
Lindeman
v. Kelso Sch. Dist. #458, 162 Wn.2d 196, 172 P.3d 329 ( |
|
|
199
|
Washington
State Farm Bureau Fed’n v. Gregoire, 162 Wn.2d 284, 174 P.3d 1142 ( |
|
|
200
|
In
re Marriage of King, 162 Wn.2d 378, 174 P.3d 659 (Dec 6, 2007) (concurring, no constitutional right to
appointed counsel when no state action) |
|
|
201
|
State
v. Brown, 162 Wn.2d 422, 173 P.3d 245 (Dec 13, 2007) (concurring, firearm
enhancement requires connection between the defendant, the crime, and the
weapon) |
|
|
202
|
In
re Det. of Kistenmacher, 163 Wn.2d 166, 178 P.3d 949 (Feb 21, 2008)
(concurring in part, dissenting in part, SVP prisoner has right to lawyer at
psychological exam and denial of that right is not harmless) |
|
|
203
|
In
re Det. of Lewis, 163 Wn.2d 188, 177 P.3d 708 (Feb 28, 2008) (concurring,
recent overt act may not be constitutionally redefined by legislature) |
|
|
204
|
State
v. Neff, 163 Wn.2d 453, 181 P.3d 819 (April 24, 2008) (concurring in part,
dissenting in part, firearm enhancement is not proper for mere possession of
gun) |
|
|
205
|
State
v. Eggleston, 164 Wn.2d 61, 187 P.3d 233 (July 10, 2008) (concurring, state
is collaterally estopped to impeach prior jury verdict) |
|
|
206
|
Brundridge
v. Fluor Federal Svcs., 164 Wn.2d 432, 191 P.3d 879 (Sep 4, 2008) (concurring
in part, dissenting in part, employee entitled to recover reasonable out of
pocket expenses as part of reasonable attorney fees) |
|
|
207
|
State
v. Eaton, 164 Wn.2d 461, 191 P.3d 1270 (Sep 11, 2008), (dissenting, conviction
should be reversed where charged with possessing wrong drug) |
|
|
208
|
Costanich
v. DSHS, 164 Wn.2d 925, 194 P.3d 988 (Oct 30,
2008) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, public party may waive
objection to reasonable attorney fee award, just as private one) |
|
|
209
|
State
v. Koslowski, 166 Wn.2d 409, 209 P.3d 479 (June 18, 2009) (concurring, error
not harmless based on “overwhelming evidence”) |
|
|
210
|
City
of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of Christ, 166 Wn.2d 633, 211 P.3d
406 (July 16, 2009) (concurring, government may not license religious
exercise, damages and attorney fees to church) |
|
|
211
|
In
re Pers. Restraint of Pullman, 167 Wn.2d 205, 218 P.3d 913 (Oct 8, 2009)
(concurring, prisoner has liberty interest in good time credit) |
|
|
212
|
State
v. Mandanas, 168 Wn.2d 84, 228 P.3d 13 (Jan 28,
2010) (concurring, unjust to double firearm enhancement for one incident and
one gun) |
|
|
213
|
State
v. A.N.J., 168 Wn.2d 91, 225 P.3d 956 (Jan 28, 2010)
(concurring, court should appoint only lawyers who meet bar guidelines to
represent the indigent) |
|
|
214
|
Burt v. Dep’t of Corrections, 168
Wn.2d 828, 231 P.3d 191 (May 13, 2010) (concurring, judges should be
skeptical of collusive lawsuit to bar discovery of public records, and pro se
plaintiffs must be required to comply with civil rules) |
|
|
215
|
State v. Jaime, -- Wn.2d --, -- P.3d
--, 2010 WL 2106242 (May 27, 2010) (concurring, expert testimony on
eyewitness identification improperly excluded) |
|
|
216
|
In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against
King, -- Wn.2d --, -- P.3d –, 2010 WL 2306420 (June 10, 2010) (concurring, lawyer under ethical
investigation has right to notice of disposition to be taken by bar) |
|
III. Dissenting Opinions
|
217
|
State
v. Hunsicker, 129 Wn.2d 554, 919 P.2d 79 (1996) (dissenting, the court must
follow applicable statute and set restitution within 60 days) |
|
218
|
State
v. Rivers, 129 Wn.2d 697, 921 P.2d 495 (1996) (dissenting, “Three Strikes
You’re Out” mandatory life without possible parole unconstitutionally cruel) |
|
219
|
Brown
v. State, 130 Wn.2d 430, 924 P.2d 908 (1996) (dissenting, turn of century
railroad deed creates easement extinguished by abandonment and title should
revert to property owners) |
|
220
|
State
v. King, 130 Wn.2d 517, 925 P.2d 606 (1996) (dissenting, defendant’s Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination violated when the State punished
defendant for disclosing during court ordered sex therapy commission of
uncharged rapes) |
|
221
|
State
v. |
|
222
|
Osborn
v. |
|
223
|
CLEAN
v. State, 130 Wn.2d 782, 928 P.2d 1054 (1996)
(dissenting, tax for major league baseball stadium is not an emergency
and therefore not exempt from public referendum) |
|
224
|
In
re the Welfare of Amyann J.R., No. 63964-7, unpublished, |
|
225
|
Leingang
v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc., 131 Wn.2d 133, 930 P.2d 288 (1997)
(dissenting, health care provider violated Consumer Protection Act and
tortiously interfered with insured’s contract with automobile insurer) |
|
226
|
Magula
v. Benton Franklin Title Co., Inc., 131 Wn.2d 171, 930 P.2d 307 (1997)
(dissenting, identity of one’s spouse is not “marital status” for purpose of
anti-discrimination law) |
|
227
|
Honey
v. |
|
228
|
Washington
State Legislature v. Lowry, 131 Wn.2d 309, 931 P.2d 885 (1997) (dissenting,
“section” for purposes of Governor’s section veto is defined by the
legislature, and appropriation item veto must vary dollar amount) |
|
229
|
Hillis
v. Dept. of Ecology, 131 Wn.2d 373, 932 P.2d 139 (1997) (dissenting,
Department of Ecology should be held to law requiring it to timely process
water rights applications, 8 year delay unlawful) |
|
230
|
Citizens
for More Important Things v. King County, 131 Wn.2d 411, 932 P.2d 135 (1997)
(dissenting, County ordinance authorizing bonds for preconstruction costs of
the new baseball stadium conflicts with the Stadium Act and is an invalid
diversion of state revenues to an unlawful purpose) |
|
231
|
Riss
v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612, 934 P.2d 669 (1997) (dissenting, members of
unincorporated homeowners associations should be held jointly and severally
liable for all debts of the association) |
|
232
|
City
of |
|
233
|
Ino
Ino, Inc. v. City of |
|
234
|
In
re Clark Garen, B.A. No. 61, unpublished, |
|
235
|
State
v. McClendon, 131 Wn.2d 853, 935 P.2d 1334 (1997) (dissenting, probationary
driver license leading to enhanced jail time is punitive, and not solely remedial,
for double jeopardy purposes) |
|
236
|
State
v. Valentine, 132 Wn.2d 1, 935 P.2d 1294 (1997) (dissenting, uphold the
common law right to resist unlawful arrest with reasonable force) |
|
237
|
Greater
Harbor 2000 v. City of Seattle, 132 Wn.2d 267, 937 P.2d 1082 (1997)
(dissenting, City of Seattle violated its own ordinances by granting
preliminary approval to vacate various streets without requiring compensation
from the party taking possession of the previously public thoroughfares) |
|
238
|
|
|
239
|
State
v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668, 940 P.2d 1239 (1997) (dissenting, defendant
unconstitutionally denied right to represent himself) |
|
240
|
Seeley
v. State, 132 Wn.2d 776, 940 P.2d 604 (1997) (dissenting, cancer patient has
constitutional right to medicinal marijuana) |
|
241
|
Matter
of Det. of McClatchey, 133 Wn.2d 1, 940 P.2d 646 (1997) (dissenting, sexual
predator who does not receive treatment during confinement is punished and
double jeopardy applies) |
|
242
|
Nivens v. 7-11 Hoagy's Corner, 133 Wn.2d 192, 943 P.2d 286
(1997) (dissenting, plaintiff improperly denied trial in suit alleging
business negligent in not providing security against a known danger) |
|
243
|
Medcalf
v. State, Dept. of Licensing, 133 Wn.2d 290, 944 P.2d 1014 (1997)
(dissenting, defendant should have been able to offer evidence that
compulsive disorder prevented ability to consent to Breathalyzer subject to
evidentiary threshold) |
|
244
|
State
v. Hamlet, 133 Wn.2d 314, 944 P.2d 1026 (1997) (dissenting, prejudicial
evidence is not harmless) |
|
245
|
State
v. Catlett, 133 Wn.2d 355, 945 P.2d 700 (1997) (dissenting, forfeiture of
defendant’s car for drug violation is punishment for purposes of double
jeopardy under Federal Constitution and, independently, State Constitution) |
|
246
|
State
v. Bourgeois, 133 Wn.2d 389, 945 P.2d 1120 (1997) (dissenting, evidence was
not harmless) |
|
247
|
Christianson
v. Snohomish Health Dist., 133 Wn.2d 647, 946 P.2d 768 (1997) (dissenting,
denial of remodel permit violates due process when no nexus to septic tank
problem) |
|
248
|
Matter
of Well, 133 Wn.2d 433, 946 P.2d 750 (1997) (dissenting, mental patient’s
petition for writ of habeas corpus not barred by one-year limitation which
applies only to those criminally convicted and sentenced) |
|
249
|
Freitag
v. McGhie, 133 Wn.2d 816, 947 P.2d 1186 (1997) (dissenting, statute of
limitations for fraudulent conveyance begins to run after the transfer was,
or could have been, discovered) |
|
250
|
Citizens
for |
|
251
|
Washington
State Coalition for Homeless v. Department of Social and Health Services, 133
Wn.2d 894, 949 P.2d 1291 (1997) (dissenting, improper to judicially mandate massive
diversion of tax dollars to fund program which the Legislature has not
authorized) |
|
252
|
Young
v. Estate of Snell, 134 Wn.2d 267, 948 P.2d 1291 (1997) (dissenting, statute
expressly disclaims any limitation period for probate claims against insurance
company) |
|
253
|
Gerberding
v. Munro, 134 Wn.2d 188, 949 P.2d 1366 (1998) (dissenting, term limits law
does not violate state constitution) |
|
254
|
Reninger
v. State Dept. of Corrections, 134 Wn.2d 437, 951 P.2d 782 (1998) (dissenting,
civil servant may sue government employer for constructive discharge and is
not barred by administrative collateral estoppel) |
|
255
|
Schooley
v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc., 134 Wn.2d 468, 951 P.2d 749 (1998) (dissenting,
a remote transferee of alcohol unlawfully sold to another minor may not
maintain an action against the original vendor) |
|
256
|
Crowe
v. Gaston, 134 Wn.2d 509, 951 P.2d 1118 (1998) (dissenting, a remote
transferee of alcohol unlawfully sold to another minor may not maintain an
action against the original vendor) |
|
257
|
State
v. Tamalini, 134 Wn.2d 725, 953 P.2d 450 (1998) (dissenting, manslaughter
instruction must be given as a lesser degree in a felony murder case where
evidence so warrants) |
|
258
|
Johnson
v. Weyerhaeuser, 134 Wn.2d 795, 953 P.2d 800 (1998) (dissenting, evidence
that an injured worker receives more in benefits while injured than he
received while working is admissible) |
|
259
|
Granite
Falls Library Capital Facility Area v. Taxpayers of Granite Falls Library
Capital Facility Area, 134 Wn.2d 825, 953 P.2d 1150 (1998) (dissenting,
library facility’s power to issue bonds amounts to unconstitutional
delegation of the taxing power) |
|
260
|
Tiegs
v. |
|
261
|
Rabon
v. City of Seattle, 135 Wn.2d 1, 954 P.2d 877 (1998) (dissenting, municipal
ordinance under which two pet dogs were sentenced to death conflicts with
state law and accordingly ordinance is invalid, sentence should be vacated,
and dogs should be returned to owner) |
|
262
|
Nielson
v. Spanaway, 135 Wn.2d 255, 956 P.2d 312 (1998) (dissenting, plaintiff is
constitutionally entitled to jury trial on amount of damages in state suit,
even after a damages amount has been found by a judge in a related federal
suit) |
|
263
|
State, Dept. of Ecology v. Theodoratus,
135 Wn.2d 582, 957 P.2d 1241 (1998) (dissenting, “beneficial
use” of water by permit is permitted use, not actual use) |
|
264
|
Weden v. |
|
265
|
Rhod‑A‑Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. |
|
266
|
Tran v. State Farm Fire and Cas. |
|
267
|
Shumway v. Payne, 136 Wn.2d 383, 964 P.2d 349 (1998)
(dissenting, where state Supreme Court has discretion to review conviction,
it cannot be said that state law bars prisoner’s petition for review) |
|
268
|
In re Disciplinary Proceeding against Heard, 136 Wn.2d
405, 963 P.2d 818 (1998) (dissenting, rules of professional conduct do not
prohibit attorney sex with client) |
|
269
|
State v. Head, 136 Wn.2d 619, 964 P.2d 1187 (1998)
(dissenting, six year delay following criminal trial before entry of written
findings of fact and conclusions of law was an unnecessary delay in violation
of article I, section 10 of the Washington Constitution) |
|
270
|
Vargas v. Lehman, No. 67190-7, unpublished Oct 12, 1998 (dissenting,
according to plain language of statute, execution of Jeremy Sagastegui must
be automatically reset to 30 days after vacation of stay) |
|
271
|
|
|
272
|
State v. |
|
273
|
Franks
& Son v. State, 136 Wn.2d 737, 966 P.2d 1232) (1998) (dissenting, dormant
commerce clause offended by trucking fee) |
|
274
|
State ex rel. Washington State Convention and Trade Center
v. Evans et al., 136 Wn.2d 811, 966 P.2d 1252 (1998) (dissenting, seizure of
private property for private use is unconstitutional) |
|
275
|
|
|
276
|
Brower v. State, 137 Wn.2d 44, 969 P.2d 42 (1998)
(dissenting, football stadium not exempt from referendum as “public
emergency) |
|
277
|
State ex rel. Quick-Ruben v. Verharen, 136 Wn.2d 888, 969
P.2d 64 (1998) (dissenting, a lawsuit raising issue of first impression not
frivolous) |
|
278
|
State v. Martin, 137 Wn.2d 149, 969 P.2d 450 (1999)
(dissenting, juvenile disposition hearing is ineffective if held after
mandatory statutory time limit) |
|
279
|
In re Disciplinary Proceedings against Turco, 137 Wn.2d
227, 970 P.2d 731 (1999) (dissenting, trial judge not subject to discipline
for off-bench, nonjudicial, nonofficial conduct) |
|
280
|
PRP of Jonathan L. Gentry, 137 Wn.2d 378, 972 P.2d 1250
(1999) (dissenting, constitutional right violated when prosecution withheld
documents) |
|
281
|
|
|
282
|
State v. Studd, 137 Wn.2d 533, 973 P.2d 1049 (1999)
(dissenting, an incorrect pattern instruction is not invited error) |
|
283
|
W.R. Grace v. Department of Revenue, 137 Wn.2d 580, 573 P.2d
1011 (1999) (dissenting, no obligation exists to pay an unconstitutional tax
which violates Dormant Commerce Clause) |
|
284
|
Hollis v. Garwall, 137 Wn.2d 683, 974 P.2d 836 (1999)
(restriction in covenant on types of residential construction does not limit
land to residential use) |
|
285
|
State
v. Finch, 137 Wn.2d 792, 975 P.2d 967 (1999) (concurring in part, dissenting
in part, unconstitutional shackling of defendant in death penalty case not
harmless error) |
|
286
|
Tradewell Group d/b/a Development Services of America v.
City of |
|
287
|
Det. of Ronald Lane Petersen, 138 Wn.2d 70, 980 P.2d 1204 (1999)
(dissenting, a person who is civilly committed as sex predator has right to
appeal and right to attorney) |
|
288
|
PRP of Gronquist, 138 Wn.2d 388, 978 P.2d 1083 (1999)
(dissenting, denial of prisoner’s right to call witnesses in serious
infraction hearing violates his constitutional right to due process) |
|
289
|
PRP of Breedlove, 138 Wn.2d 298, 979 P.2d 417 (1999)
(dissenting, stipulation to an exceptional sentence insufficient to justify
it under statute) |
|
290
|
Aviation West Corp. v. Department of Labor & Indus.,
138 Wn.2d 413, 980 P.2d 701 (1999) (No. 66574-5) (dissenting, administrative
regulation against workplace smoking invalid) |
|
291
|
State v. Robbins, 138 Wn.2d 486, 980 P.2d 725 (1999)
(dissenting, statute which criminalizes post driving blood alcohol content,
per se, is unconstitutional) |
|
292
|
In re Ardis Clayton Trapp III, Bar Applicant, unpublished
( |
|
293
|
Landmark Development v. City of |
|
294
|
Benjamin v. Washington State Bar Ass’n, 138 Wn.2d 506, 980
P.2d 742 (1999) (dissenting, wrongful discharge of public employee for
exercise of first amendment speech) |
|
295
|
CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop, 138 Wn.2d 699, 985 P.2d
262 (1999) (concurring in dissents, no corporate responsibility for sex
abuse) |
|
296
|
Currens v. Sleek, 138 Wn.2d 858, 983 P.2d 626 (1999)
(dissenting, common enemy rule for water damage) |
|
297
|
PRP
of Ecklund, 139 Wn.2d 166, 985 P.2d 342 (Oct. 7, 1999) (dissenting, failure
to confess crime insufficient basis to deny parole) |
|
298
|
State
v. Clark Elmore, 139 Wn.2d 250, 985 P.2d 289 (Oct. 7, 1999) (dissenting,
error to send tape player to jury absent notice & express ruling by trial
judge) |
|
299
|
Det.
of Elmer Campbell, 139 Wn.2d 341, 986 P.2d 771 (Oct. 21, 1999) (No. 63986-8)
(dissenting, sex predator is unconstitutionally confined in punitive
conditions) |
|
300
|
Det.
of Richard Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 986 P.2d 790 (Oct. 21, 1999) (No. 64100-5)
(dissenting, same as Campbell, plus other issues) |
|
301
|
In
re PRPs of Yim and Samphao, 139 Wn.2d 581, 989 P.2d 512 (Dec 02, 1999) (Nos.
67183-4) (dissenting, a firework is not an “explosive” for purposes of
Explosives Act) |
|
302
|
Waremart
v. Progressive Campaigns, 139 Wn.2d 623, 989 P.2d 524 (Dec 16, 1999) (No.
67029-3) (dissenting, right to gather initiative signatures not limited to
shopping malls) |
|
303
|
Trimble
v. |
|
304
|
|
|
305
|
Drinkwitz
& Caproni v. Alliant Techsystems, 140 Wn.2d 291, 996 P.2d 582 ( |
|
306
|
Allan
v. |
|
307
|
Sundquist
Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish County PUD #1, 140 Wn.2d 403, 997 P.2d 915 ( |
|
308
|
In
re Disciplinary Proceeding against Lowell K. Halverson, 140 Wn.2d 475, 998
P.2d 833 (Apr 27, 2000) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, attorney
involved in sexual affair with client did not fail to render candid advice or
exercise independent judgment) |
|
309
|
M.A.
Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wn.2d 568, 998 P.2d 305 ( |
|
310
|
State
ex rel. Evergreen Freedom Found. v. Washington Education Ass’n, 140 Wn.2d
615, 999 P.2d 602 ( |
|
311
|
In
re Det. of Donald Henrickson, 140 Wn.2d 686, 2 P.3d 473 ( |
|
312
|
State
v. |
|
313
|
In
re PRP of Mark Alan Crabtree, 141 Wn.2d 577, 9 P.3d 814 ( |
|
314
|
State
v. Bradley, 141 Wn.2d 731, 10 P.3d 358 ( |
|
315
|
State
v. Cecil Emil Davis, 141 Wn.2d 798, 10 P.3d 977 ( |
|
316
|
Postema
v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd., 142 Wn.2d 68, 11 P.3d 726 ( |
|
317
|
State
v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17, 11 P.3d 714 ( |
|
318
|
Amalgamated
Transit Union Local 587 v. State, 142 Wn.2d 183, 11 P.3d 762 (Oct 26, 2000)
(dissenting, Initiative Measure 695 constitutional single subject, proper
exercise of inherent authority to condition enactments on vote of people, and
not invalid for alleged failure to set forth amended statutes verbatim) |
|
319
|
Haley
v. |
|
320
|
In
re PRP of Brent Allen Davis, 142 Wn.2d 165, 12 P.3d 603 ( |
|
321
|
In
re PRP of Darold J. Stenson, 142 Wn.2d 710, 16 P.3d 1 ( |
|
322
|
State
v. Negash Atsbeha, 142 Wn.2d 904, 16 P.3d 626 ( |
|
323
|
Hallauer
v. Spectrum Properties, 143 Wn.2d 126, 18 P.3d 540 ( |
|
324
|
State
v. Daniel Platt, 143 Wn.2d 242, 19 P.3d 412 ( |
|
325
|
In re
Pers. Restraint of Richard Dyer, 143 Wn.2d 384, 20 P.3d 907 ( |
|
326
|
In
re Pers. Restraint of Paul J. Becker, 143 Wn.2d 491, 20 P.3d 409 ( |
|
327
|
In
re Pers. Restraint of Cal Brown, 143 Wn.2d 431, 21 P.3d 687 ( |
|
328
|
State
v. Dwayne Anthony Woods, 143 Wn.2d 561, 23 P.3d 1046 ( |
|
329
|
Liberty
Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tripp, 144 Wn.2d 1, 25 P.3d 997 (June 28, 2001)
(concurring in part, dissenting in part, UIM insurance company not prejudiced
by settlement between insured an |
|
330
|
State
v. Elledge, 144 Wn.2d 62, 26 P.3d 271 ( |
|
331
|
State
v. Stein, 144 Wn.2d 236, 27 P.3d 184 ( |
|
332
|
PRP
of Connick, 144 Wn.2d 44, 28 P.3d 729 ( |
|
333
|
To-Ro
Trade Shows v. Collins, 144 Wn.2d 403, 27 P.3d 1149 ( |
|
334
|
State
v. Horrace, 144 Wn.2d 386, 28 P.3d 753 ( |
|
335
|
State
v. Vrieling, 144 Wn.2d 489, 28 P.3d 762 ( |
|
336
|
State
v. Heinsma, 144 Wn.2d 556, 29 P.3d 709 ( |
|
337
|
Recall
of Lakewood City Council, 144 Wn.2d 583, 30 P.3d 474 ( |
|
338
|
Babcock
v. Mason County Fire District, 144
Wn.2d 774, 30 P.3d 1261 ( |
|
339
|
State
v. Demery, 144 Wn.2d 753, 30 P.3d 1278 ( |
|
340
|
Kim
v. Lee, 145 Wn.2d 79, 31 P.3d 665 ( |
|
341
|
State
v. Breazeale, 144 Wn.2d 829, 31 P.3d 1155 ( |
|
342
|
Budget
Rent A Car Corp. v. Dep’t of Licensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 31 P.3d 1174 (Oct 4,
2001) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, “total fleet” to calculate tax
on car rental companies should be average, not highest, number of cars) |
|
343
|
State
v. Wheeler, 145 Wn.2d 116, 34 P.3d 799 ( |
|
344
|
State
v. Fire, 145 Wn.2d 152, 34 P.3d 1218 ( |
|
345
|
Pickett
v. Holland America Line, 145 Wn.2d 178, 35 P.3d 351 ( |
|
346
|
In
re Pers. Restraint of Stoudmire, 145 Wn.2d 258, 36 P.3d 1005 ( |
|
347
|
In
re Det. of Brooks, 145 Wn.2d 275, 36 P.3d 1034 (Dec. 27, 2001) (concurring in
part, dissenting in part, proof beyond reasonable doubt in sex predator
statute requires proof that prisoner will
reoffend, not that he will likely
reoffend) |
|
348
|
Sedlacek
v. Hillis, 145 Wn.2d 379, 36 P.3d 1014 ( |
|
349
|
State
v. McNeal, 145 Wn.2d 352, 37 P.3d 280 ( |
|
350
|
Rios
v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 145 Wn.2d 483, 39 P.3d 961 ( |
|
351
|
ATU
Legislative Council v. State, 145 Wn.2d 544, 40 P.3d 656 (Feb. 14, 2002)
(concurring in part, dissenting in part, personal property tax not repealed by
legislature) |
|
352
|
State
v. |
|
353
|
Grant
County Fire Prot. Dist. v. City of Moses Lake, 145 Wn.2d 702, 42 P.3d 394
(Mar 14, 2002) (dissenting, state privileges and immunities clause differs
from equal protection, deserves independent interpretation but does not
prohibit land petition method of annexation) |
|
354
|
Asarco
Inc. v. Dep’t of Ecology, 145 Wn.2d 750, 43 P.3d 471 ( |
|
355
|
DOE
v. Campbell & Gwinn, 146 Wn.2d 1, 43 P.3d 4 ( |
|
356
|
City
of |
|
357
|
State
v. Rodriguez, 146 Wn.2d 260, 45 P.3d 541 ( |
|
358
|
King
v. |
|
359
|
Litowitz
v. Litowitz, 146 Wn.2d 514, 48 P.3d 261 ( |
|
360
|
State
v. Schultz, 146 Wn.2d 540, 48 P.3d 301 ( |
|
361
|
State
v. Coria, 146 Wn.2d 631, 48 P.3d 980 ( |
|
362
|
Wingert
v. Yellow Freight System, Inc. 146 Wn.2d 841, 50 P.3d 256 ( |
|
363
|
Isla
Verde Int’l Holdings v. City of Camas, 146 Wn.2d 740, 49 P.3d 867 (July 11,
2002) (concurring in part, dissenting in part, plat condition requiring
access over adjoining private property violates due process) |
|
364
|
PUD
No. 1 of |
|
365
|
State
v. Jeremy Read, 147 Wn.2d 238, 53 P.3d 26 ( |
|
366
|
WR
Enterprises Inc. v. Labor & Industries, 147 Wn.2d 213, 53 P.3d 504 ( |
|
367
|
In
re Det. of C.W., 147 Wn.2d 259, 53 P.3d 979 ( |
|
368
|
State
v. Brown, 147 Wn.2d 330, 58 P.3d 889 ( |
|
369
|
State
v. Borrero, 147 Wn.2d 353, 58 P.3d 245 ( |
|
370
|
PRP
of Hemenway, 147 Wn.2d 529, 55 P.3d 615 ( |
|
371
|
State
v. Schelin, 147 Wn.2d 562, 55 P.3d 632 ( |
|
372
|
Lawyers
Title Ins. Corp. v. Baik, 147 Wn.2d 536, 55 P.3d 619 ( |
|
373
|
State
v. Townsend, 147 Wn.2d 666, 57 P.3d 255 ( |
|
374
|
|
|
375
|
City
of |
|
376
|
McGowan
v. State, 148 Wn.2d 278, 60 P.3d 67 ( |
|
377
|
City
of |
|
378
|
Fraternal
Order of Eagles v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of Eagles, 148 Wn.2d 224,
59 P.3d 655 ( |
|
379
|
State
v. Tili, 148 Wn.2d 350, 60 P.3d 1192 ( |
|
380
|
State
v. C.J., 148 Wn.2d 672, 63 P.3d 765 ( |
|
381
|
State
v. Acrey, 148 Wn.2d 738, 64 P.3d 594 ( |
|
382
|
Eggleston
v. |
|
383
|
State
v. Ward, State v. Baker, 148 Wn.2d 803, 64 P.3d 640 ( |
|
384
|
State
v. |
|
385
|
In
re Parentage of Jannot, 149 Wn.2d 123, 65 P.3d 664 ( |
|
386
|
S |